I can’t take seriously anyone who believes that humans should not eat animal products when we evolved to eat and are therefore designed to eat them. I almost have to wonder if the nutritional deficiencies have caused brain damage.
Ahh yes, the “Science”. Trust the Science, trust the experts. Don’t trust your own eyes or your experience. Soy good, steak bad! People healing their bodies with meat? Vegans dying of starvation? That’s not the Science. Here have a jab. Died Suddenly? Science says... we don’t know.
To back up what this essay points out about algae blooms, I'll re-post this here..
Last time CO2 & temperature rose this fast (250m yrs ago) it created algae blooms that destroyed all oceans & 95% of all life on Earth. It is happening again. See:
Nature Is Giving Humanity Our Final Extinction Crisis Warning
In the few months since I wrote that essay, 100s of dead sea lions & dolphins have appeared on CA beaches due to an unprecedented offshore algae bloom, signaling a possible mass ocean die off. Here's the NOAA report on the sea lion & dolphin deaths.
The exceptionally warm global temperature in 2023 is part of a trend of warming since 2015 that is associated primarily with greater absorption of solar radiation in the earth-atmosphere system. This increase in absorbed solar radiation is driven by a slow decline in springtime snow extent. (which anthropogenic climate change significantly contributes to), but primary by a reduction in reflection from the atmosphere driven by reduced cloudiness (which climate change significantly contributes to- it influences all weather) and to a lesser extent a reduction in atmospheric aerosol (from shipping ban). Any increase in the greenhouse effect from increasing CO2 (Co2 emissions do not have to have INCREASED for them to significantly contribute) (which impacts the longwave radiation budget) is lost in the noise.
This is totally disingenuous. Yes, it was less cloudy because of the heat wave which global warming contributes to.
I think we can safely say that the fires in Maui were engineered to some degree at least - however that happened - because what we see clear evidence of is very strange reporting of deaths which fits Revelation of the Method-style reporting of fakery to a T. See my comment:
I felt sure that the extraordinary 2019-2020 bushfires in Australia were engineered to some degree as well with very strange reporting of certain deaths and people's loss of houses - which isn't to say that houses weren't lost, they clearly were - but there was definitely some sort of engineering going on and my cousin who is a firefighter told me that the backburning measures to prevent worse fires wasn't managed properly.
I feel it went beyond that - I think deliberateness was involved ... and there was definite fakery of death, no doubt whatsoever about that ... so how does that fit?
No I wasn't suggesting that although I have to say I'm just not so very certain as I was on climate change - but no those things don't undermine the case for it.
“Climate change” is a meaningless term. The climate by definition is always changing. It’s not by accident that the climate change and virus fear-mongers find themselves in the same cult that hates humanity.
The relevance is the denial or acceptance of climate change, the trashing or embracing of environmentalists, the promotion of oil and animal ag or having reservations, being against immigration on the grounds that globalists are making an army or looking at the issues......
I haven't switched camps yet, however, I follow a UK statistician pseudonymed John Dee, who has substacks on both covid and climate and describes himself as:
"A former PSO/G7 UK government scientist and one-time NHS 'suit' who, being an applied statistician, simply can't resist crunching numbers for breakfast each day."
His analysis at a very nitty-gritty level paints a slightly different picture ... and I must say I'm starting to feel not as certain as I was about the climate emergency.
They are complaining that temperatures were adjusted because historically some were taken in the afternoon when it was hotter rather than the morning when it was cooler (seems reasonable) and claim that only the raw data can be trusted. Even if you still distrust the altered data, globally it makes very little difference. Even if you still distrust surface temperatures since the 1990s because of decreasing data points, the temperature of the sea, which accounts for 90% of global warming, provides a very clear picture. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series/globe/ocean/1/7/1850-2023
The missing data in the article I link to is in the last two decades. The graph provided shows that there are far more days of missing data from the 21 long-term temperature stations in existence since at least 1880 in the last two decades than in all previous decades. There could be a perfectly good reason for this but at first sight it seems very strange. In the next part of the article John will look at the missing days of data for individual stations of the 21 which will perhaps show some interesting trend.
I wouldn't draw any conclusions myself without first running seeming anomalies past climate scientists but I'll wait and see what John comes up with.
Yeah just 21 stations out of 32,000. Perhaps it means they should be updated, they've been going for over 143 years. Perhaps JD has too much time on his hands.
Yes and no. His numbers are very transparent - it's not as if he's pretending there's only 21 temperature stations, he just questions the missing days in the longterm ones in the last two decades. Unfortunately, so many websites are echo chambers so none of John's subscribers are pro-AGW - I guess apart from me who is no expert - so there's no one to say, "Well, that's because X," or "It's irrelevant because Y," or whatever.
His figures do show that the night-time temperature has warmed in the UK over the last hundred years by a degree C I think while the daytime temperature hasn't warmed and he questioned how the increase in night-time temperature relates to CO2. I put a link to the explanation to do with clouds reflecting sunlight during the day while they absorb heat at night in some locations (while the opposite occurs in others). He presented a link to Watt's Up With That disputing the cloud reflection thing which I admit I didn't pursue ... so he does admit to nighttime temperature increase in the UK at least.
Lucky you.. my circle of friends who are all jabbed includes a long list of possible SAE since last year. Two breast cancer relapses.. one stomach cancer.. one turbo tumor.. three blood cancers of different types, one alopecia w diabetes & one rapid pancreatic cancer death.. being almost 70years old w lots of years to have friends fall ill this is well beyond anything in typical decade.. not a shred of doubt in my mind the mRNA transfections maim & kill.
If you watch any of the videos on recent increased death rates by Doctor of Nursing John Campbell, it becomes clear that the jabs are causing increased deaths (a *lot* of them) and that side effects of the lockdowns don't make sense as the cause. Here's his site:
HIya, I don't rate him and he is talking about excess deaths, which are compared to the previous 5 year average! They can be confusing and misleading ie 'excess' death may appear to double if previous years have been low. Also a doubling of say 5 to 10 deaths is not so significant if the population size is large.
Even in 2020 the death rate was lower than in 2008 and than in every year before that. The death rate fell in 2021 from 2020 and fell again in 2022 even though 'excess' deaths when compared to the previous low years appeared to be worrying. The same will be happening in 2023.
The point I am making is that the populations in the UK,OZ, Japan and US are stable or rising (in the US rising by a few million), we are not being culled by the vaccines, as globalist theory said we would be.
After the first few paragraphs I was waiting for the hint that this was satire. It never came.
Yikes. You sound like someone who took the jab in exchange for a donut.
I've taken the who bit out. Unnecessary and confusing. 🙏🏽
I can’t take seriously anyone who believes that humans should not eat animal products when we evolved to eat and are therefore designed to eat them. I almost have to wonder if the nutritional deficiencies have caused brain damage.
You're proving my point. This is not what the science shows. You've been fooled by the hype.
Ahh yes, the “Science”. Trust the Science, trust the experts. Don’t trust your own eyes or your experience. Soy good, steak bad! People healing their bodies with meat? Vegans dying of starvation? That’s not the Science. Here have a jab. Died Suddenly? Science says... we don’t know.
when they said trust the science they meant trust them.
anyone who actually read the science knew they were lying and what to trust.
as well as common sense of course and the evidence of their own eyes
Yikes. I think I better edit a bit
To back up what this essay points out about algae blooms, I'll re-post this here..
Last time CO2 & temperature rose this fast (250m yrs ago) it created algae blooms that destroyed all oceans & 95% of all life on Earth. It is happening again. See:
Nature Is Giving Humanity Our Final Extinction Crisis Warning
https://ericbrooks.substack.com/p/nature-is-giving-humanity-our-final
In the few months since I wrote that essay, 100s of dead sea lions & dolphins have appeared on CA beaches due to an unprecedented offshore algae bloom, signaling a possible mass ocean die off. Here's the NOAA report on the sea lion & dolphin deaths.
https://fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/toxic-algal-bloom-suspected-dolphin-and-sea-lion-deaths-southern-california
Thank you Eric. Even though its so depressing.
Thanks for your article. This may be of some interest to you: https://judithcurry.com/2023/08/14/state-of-the-climate-summer-2023/#respond
Thank you for this LHM. I've added her in. All grist to the mill.
🙏🏽
The exceptionally warm global temperature in 2023 is part of a trend of warming since 2015 that is associated primarily with greater absorption of solar radiation in the earth-atmosphere system. This increase in absorbed solar radiation is driven by a slow decline in springtime snow extent. (which anthropogenic climate change significantly contributes to), but primary by a reduction in reflection from the atmosphere driven by reduced cloudiness (which climate change significantly contributes to- it influences all weather) and to a lesser extent a reduction in atmospheric aerosol (from shipping ban). Any increase in the greenhouse effect from increasing CO2 (Co2 emissions do not have to have INCREASED for them to significantly contribute) (which impacts the longwave radiation budget) is lost in the noise.
This is totally disingenuous. Yes, it was less cloudy because of the heat wave which global warming contributes to.
It also doesn't explain the increasing 10 year averages since 1880.
Just a silly article that should be ignored.
I shall ignore your silly comment too.
I think we can safely say that the fires in Maui were engineered to some degree at least - however that happened - because what we see clear evidence of is very strange reporting of deaths which fits Revelation of the Method-style reporting of fakery to a T. See my comment:
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/1b1/comment/36711550
I felt sure that the extraordinary 2019-2020 bushfires in Australia were engineered to some degree as well with very strange reporting of certain deaths and people's loss of houses - which isn't to say that houses weren't lost, they clearly were - but there was definitely some sort of engineering going on and my cousin who is a firefighter told me that the backburning measures to prevent worse fires wasn't managed properly.
yes the whole things stinks. but mismanaged bushfires still get out of hand because of bush being so hot and dry.
I feel it went beyond that - I think deliberateness was involved ... and there was definite fakery of death, no doubt whatsoever about that ... so how does that fit?
It stinks. It does't alter the fact of climate change.
No I wasn't suggesting that although I have to say I'm just not so very certain as I was on climate change - but no those things don't undermine the case for it.
“Climate change” is a meaningless term. The climate by definition is always changing. It’s not by accident that the climate change and virus fear-mongers find themselves in the same cult that hates humanity.
What this amounts to seems to be:
A series of criminal assaults on global health and freedom which benefits a narrow elite is not part of a grand master plan.
So instead it’s corporate power and greed, a dash of ideology, the interconnectedness the internet permits, and groupthink.
Forgive me for not really seeing the relevance of the distinction.
The relevance is the denial or acceptance of climate change, the trashing or embracing of environmentalists, the promotion of oil and animal ag or having reservations, being against immigration on the grounds that globalists are making an army or looking at the issues......
I think it may well be both.
I haven't switched camps yet, however, I follow a UK statistician pseudonymed John Dee, who has substacks on both covid and climate and describes himself as:
"A former PSO/G7 UK government scientist and one-time NHS 'suit' who, being an applied statistician, simply can't resist crunching numbers for breakfast each day."
His analysis at a very nitty-gritty level paints a slightly different picture ... and I must say I'm starting to feel not as certain as I was about the climate emergency.
https://jdeeclimate.substack.com/p/bend-it-like-nasa/
They are complaining that temperatures were adjusted because historically some were taken in the afternoon when it was hotter rather than the morning when it was cooler (seems reasonable) and claim that only the raw data can be trusted. Even if you still distrust the altered data, globally it makes very little difference. Even if you still distrust surface temperatures since the 1990s because of decreasing data points, the temperature of the sea, which accounts for 90% of global warming, provides a very clear picture. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series/globe/ocean/1/7/1850-2023
The missing data in the article I link to is in the last two decades. The graph provided shows that there are far more days of missing data from the 21 long-term temperature stations in existence since at least 1880 in the last two decades than in all previous decades. There could be a perfectly good reason for this but at first sight it seems very strange. In the next part of the article John will look at the missing days of data for individual stations of the 21 which will perhaps show some interesting trend.
I wouldn't draw any conclusions myself without first running seeming anomalies past climate scientists but I'll wait and see what John comes up with.
Yeah just 21 stations out of 32,000. Perhaps it means they should be updated, they've been going for over 143 years. Perhaps JD has too much time on his hands.
Maybe but as a statistician you'd think he'd know what's important and what isn't.
That's absolutely hilarious. As a statistician he'd know how to make the numbers say anything he wanted. Lies, damn lies and stats.
Yes and no. His numbers are very transparent - it's not as if he's pretending there's only 21 temperature stations, he just questions the missing days in the longterm ones in the last two decades. Unfortunately, so many websites are echo chambers so none of John's subscribers are pro-AGW - I guess apart from me who is no expert - so there's no one to say, "Well, that's because X," or "It's irrelevant because Y," or whatever.
His figures do show that the night-time temperature has warmed in the UK over the last hundred years by a degree C I think while the daytime temperature hasn't warmed and he questioned how the increase in night-time temperature relates to CO2. I put a link to the explanation to do with clouds reflecting sunlight during the day while they absorb heat at night in some locations (while the opposite occurs in others). He presented a link to Watt's Up With That disputing the cloud reflection thing which I admit I didn't pursue ... so he does admit to nighttime temperature increase in the UK at least.
this is all similar or from the work of Heller. It's lies about adjusting and missing data that just won't go away https://skepticalscience.com/zombies-devour-telegraph-fox-news-brains.html
Ancedotes yes, please see https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/deaths-england-and-wales-2020-2022 for the actual numbers of people who dropped dead. Ancedotally no on I know has had a jab injury nor death.
Lucky you.. my circle of friends who are all jabbed includes a long list of possible SAE since last year. Two breast cancer relapses.. one stomach cancer.. one turbo tumor.. three blood cancers of different types, one alopecia w diabetes & one rapid pancreatic cancer death.. being almost 70years old w lots of years to have friends fall ill this is well beyond anything in typical decade.. not a shred of doubt in my mind the mRNA transfections maim & kill.
I am so sorry. I have not a shred of doubt either that they maim and kill, but mostly maim.
If you watch any of the videos on recent increased death rates by Doctor of Nursing John Campbell, it becomes clear that the jabs are causing increased deaths (a *lot* of them) and that side effects of the lockdowns don't make sense as the cause. Here's his site:
https://rumble.com/c/DrJohnCampbell
HIya, I don't rate him and he is talking about excess deaths, which are compared to the previous 5 year average! They can be confusing and misleading ie 'excess' death may appear to double if previous years have been low. Also a doubling of say 5 to 10 deaths is not so significant if the population size is large.
The death rate can only be calculated at the end of the year as a percentage of the population as a whole, and then ideally adjusted for an ageing population. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/deaths-england-and-wales-2020-2022
The years 2010 to 2019 were very low deaths.
Even in 2020 the death rate was lower than in 2008 and than in every year before that. The death rate fell in 2021 from 2020 and fell again in 2022 even though 'excess' deaths when compared to the previous low years appeared to be worrying. The same will be happening in 2023.
The population in E and W is incredibly long lived and is not being depopulated though of course the vaccines are killing people. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/excess-mortality-what-does-it-show
Jo
🙏🏽
The point I am making is that the populations in the UK,OZ, Japan and US are stable or rising (in the US rising by a few million), we are not being culled by the vaccines, as globalist theory said we would be.
teehee you've made my day and it's only 8.59 am