How power couple Pharma + Regulation are fooling us

that toxic drugs are effective

1. Introduce product after period of steep decline in deaths due to improved sanitation and unjustly claim the benefits.

2. Change criteria or definition of disease after introduction of product. In 1955, the year the Salk vaccine for polio was introduced, patients with symptoms of aseptic meningitis and coxsackie virus were no longer included in a diagnosis of polio. A concerted effect was also made to distinguish conditions such as acute flaccid paralysis, transverse myelitis, Reye’s syndrome, GBS and chronic fatigue syndrome that would have previously been labelled as polio. These changes made the vaccine appear effective against polio though it absolutely was not.

3. Increase parameters of disease after introduction of product. After the introduction of AZT AIDS parameters were expanded to include healthy people with positive HIV tests, those with mild to moderate disease, those with TB, cervical cancer, lymphadenopathy, healthy people with CD4 counts below 200 and people with negative tests or no test with any indicator such as weight loss. When these people diagnosed with ‘AIDS’, though healthy or with other conditions, died their deaths would not be recorded as AIDS, thus it appeared that introduction of AZT reduced the death rate from AIDS. Even if AZT killed every patient treated with it, it would still appear that AZT had decreased the death rate from ‘HIV’. AZT did in fact kill nearly everyone treated with it.

Survival rates from breast cancer have also been made to appear to increase due to treatments in the last decade. This is because breast screening has led to over-diagnosis of small, harmless cancers included in the numbers, not because of improvements in treatments.

Other ways to market drugs include

1. Use of surrogate markers such as cholesterol levels, CD4 cells, sugar control, bone mineral density and tumour shrinkage. These markers are improved with statins, AZT, metformin, biphosphonates or monoclonals and cancer drugs but they are not necessarily correlated with beneficial health and survival outcomes and often make outcomes much worse.

2. Use relative (eg Pfizer vaccine 95%) instead of absolute efficacy (eg for Pfizer vaccine 0.85%) to overemphasise the benefits of treatment. Use absolute instead of relative efficacy for harms of treatment to underemphasise adverse effects.

3. Compare drug or treatment, not against placebo, but against another commonly used drug. Once a treatment such as chemo or radiotherapy, drug or vaccine has been introduced it becomes impossible to test its actual benefit against placebo, as the withholding of treatment is thought to be unethical.

4. Compare drug against another drug administered in an inappropriately high or inappropriately low dose.

5. Use a fauxcebo, for example, to test a vaccine against a heavy metal containing adjuvant, to mask toxic effect of treatment. The Astra Zeneca Covid vaccine was tested against the meningitis jab, which not only added another variable, but also masked adverse events.

6. Categorise serious events, such as Maddie de Garay, in the Pfizer trial, who now must be fed through a tube, as unserious, for example in de Garay’s case, she was categorised as having stomach issues.

7. Fraudulently manipulate data, for example, include the results of an unblinded group as part of the blinded group or children as part of an adult study. Eject people with adverse events in the treatment arm out of the study. Leave out adverse events such as deaths from the results and only include them in an appendix. Allow lax laboratory practice and mishandling of specimens and ignore when brought to attention.

8. Hide adverse events or illness in the vaccinated by classifying them as unvaccinated for weeks after vaccination.

9. Don’t tell people that drugs are only effective in a small number of people who take them, for example cancer therapy drugs with strong side-effects only have beneficial outcomes in a small percentage of people.

10. Don’t tell people the effects of long term use of drugs for example anti-inflammatory drugs can completely destroy adrenal function, and hypertension drugs which can completely destroy kidney function.

11. Don’t tell people that giving antibiotics to babies and children as a ‘precaution’, may cause allergies, asthma and eczema to develop.

12. Categorised drugs as 'life saving’ if they extend life by a few months, weeks or even days. For example the median life extension of highly nauseating cancer chemotherapy drugs is 2.1 months.

13. Disease monger, for example, detox symptoms (mucus, cough, rashes, pustules) are classified as infectious disease requiring suprression and vaccines and the medicalisation of normal childhood behaviour. The use of ineffective and harmful drugs for ADHD, depression and mental illnesses in all ages causes yet more ‘disease’.

14. Keep the repeating (with no evidence) that ‘viruses’ and the proliferation of bacteria are the cause of disease.

15. Stigmatise natural healers and those who chose not vaccinate or have chemotherapy or other treatments as irresponsible, dangerous hippies

16. Use marketing tactics to promote drugs that are still in clinical trials to create demand even though safety has not been assessed. For example, headlines say that mRNA-4157 (V940) offers ‘real hope’, even though it is still in Phase III. The drug appears to prolong percentage remission of recurrence of melanoma at 18 months. However at 3 years the combination of the drug with pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab on its own showed the same percentage recurrence.

17. Use marketing tactics to pretend that drugs, such as ‘gene therapy’ CAR T cell technology, have been suppressed (by the companies who spent $billions developing them) because they offer a ‘cure’ and therefore destroy the cancer market. This can create intense demand for toxic drugs. Case studies of those who survive these experimental treatments make better headlines than those who die from them, though the placebo effect, which short of growing limbs back, can account for just about anything. For example the leukaemia CD19 therapy appeared to offer remission, for the few it didn’t kill, though it does inadvertently destroy B cells which then requires long term use of monoclonals and other drugs. It is creating markets not destroying them and is not a cure, the cells the drug has caused to express CD19 die; the DNA is not permanently altered, though B cell function may be permanently destroyed. T cell therapy works like a vaccine and is not a good thing. It trains the ‘immune system’ to suppress the proteins and cells involved in the complex homeostatic and healing processes of the body that we call ‘disease’ and which we understand very little of. The reason it is not more widely used, though FDA approved, is not that it cures cancer but that it’s lethal for so many.

18. Make it impossible to withdraw against placebo a drug that has no proven clinical significance for ‘ethical’ reasons.

19. The truth that pharma and regulation dare not mention and which they suppress with all their might… is that disease can be prevented with nutrition, expression of emotion, rest, community, fresh air and exercise.

20. Any I’ve missed?

🐒