I really don't like the way Russell Brand is being compared to Andrew Tate

they are poles apart

Whatever either of these men have or haven’t done and whether it can be disproved or proved, they are completely different.

The allegations against Andrew Tate do not seem to have damaged his reputation, businesses nor income. He has ‘adult entertainment’ interests in webcams and pornography and profits from casinos and gambling.

The allegations against Brand, who is all about supporting those recovering from addictions to gambling, alcohol and drugs (often associated with prostitution), have severally damaged his reputation. His foundation for addicts is apparently ‘assessing’ the allegations and both youtube and rumble have already or have been asked by the Government to ‘demonetise’ him, though of course the MSM will continue to profit from the scandal.

Andrew Tate boasts about the number of cars he owns and allegedly the women he has ‘broken’. Russell Brand may once have been an insufferable coke-head and sex addict but he is now a loving family man who promotes meditation, yoga and finding happiness and health through non-materialistic and non-pharmacological means. Tate is a climate denier or non-carer, Brand is vegan because he thinks animal agriculture is cruel and accepts the disaster that is climate change and environmental destruction. He is also a vocal and active supporter of Julian Assange.

Andrew Tate is still being interviewed all over the internet.

Russell Brand has been silenced.

🐒