Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kirsten's avatar

Interesting, "marketing tests before a person could get life insurance." I can get that angle, thanks for putting the excess deaths into perspective.

I imagine you don't watch Joe Rogan with any regularity...? I don't think he's anti-vegan, he's covered the health effects of veganism more than once as I recall. And he's against animal cruelty. Many people cite "other people talking about Joe Rogan" rather than listening to him themselves. I love it when people say he's right-wing, because I can reply emphatically "I know for a fact you don't listen to Joe Rogan yourself". At the same time, Joe may have a role to play in corralling the "health freedom movement" in a certain direction - I'm very aware of that.

Expand full comment
rjt's avatar

I find the first graph difficult because it appears to show "relative risk." I was even caught by the Pfi$er "95% Effective" claim based on "Relative Risk" while obscuring the absolute values.

The graph with the blue bars looks to show increased (and increasing) mortality rates after 2020.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts