The latest from US politics: anti-war Tulsi Gabbard is now pro-war.
Apparently some people are surprised.
What can we learn from former anti-war pundit Tulsi Gabbard joining Trump in finding fictional WMDs as an excuse for invasion and regime changing in Iran?
That they know appearing to be anti-war is a vote winner.
That either party can be the anti-war party at any time: the parties are completely interchangeable.
That the same candidate, like Trump, can be framed (including by the 'opposition') as anti-war (accused of being too soft in 2024, as well as gaining Gabbard, which perpetuated the myth) or pro-war (accused of this by Gabbard in 2020).
That they are just playing with us. It's not about which party or candidate is best, or worst. Once in power they do the behest of the deep state (US based arms, fossil fuels, animal ag, tech, banking and media).
And that means war and invasion. It means maintaining US hegemony and blowing up Beijing if possible. It means continuing to profit and pollute and sealing off the rest of the world from coming to America when their crops fail.
The bonus win with Trump is that he also walks back climate and environmental polices and makes it OK to be openly racist. All of which gained support from 'woke' policies allegedly pushed by the 'opposition'. All of it is manipulation, lighting and stage craft.
In fact it's pro wresting.
🐒