The power grab by the WHO is not a globalist hoax

and we're in big trouble.

The economic 'reset' for the ‘so-called’ climate crisis was always a globalist hoax by the industry funded, climate change denying Heartland institute and others.

However, the global takeover of health regulation by the totally corrupt WHO is not. It is the next logical step and business as usual by organised crime, also known as the revolving door between Pharma and regulation. We’ve known for decades that this was going on in nation states where health care is regulated by governments completely in the pocket of pharma.

Here are a few ways toxic and useless products are forced on people;

1. Introduce product after period of steep decline in deaths due to improved sanitation and unjustly claim the benefits.

2. Change criteria or definition of disease after introduction of product. In 1955, the year the Salk vaccine for polio was introduced, patients with symptoms of aseptic meningitis and coxsackie virus were no longer included in a diagnosis of polio. A concerted effect was also made to distinguish conditions such as acute flaccid paralysis, transverse myelitis, Reye’s syndrome, GBS and chronic fatigue syndrome that would have previously been labelled as polio. These changes made the vaccine appear effective against polio.

3. Increase parameters of disease after introduction of product. After the introduction of AZT AIDS parameters were expanded to include healthy people with positive HIV tests, those with mild to moderate disease, those with TB, cervical cancer, lymphadenopathy, healthy people with CD4 counts below 200 and people with negative tests or no test with any indicator such as weight loss. When these people diagnosed with ‘AIDS’, though healthy or with other conditions, died their deaths would not be recorded as AIDS, thus it appeared that introduction of AZT reduced the death rate from AIDS. Even if AZT killed every patient treated with it, it would still appear that AZT had decreased the death rate from ‘HIV’. AZT did in fact kill nearly everyone treated with it.

Claim that survival rates from breast cancer have increased due to treatments but don’t explain that this is due to breast screening leading to over-diagnosis of small, harmless cancers.

Other ways to market drugs include

1. Use of surrogate markers such as cholesterol levels, CD4/viral load, sugar control and tumour shrinkage. These markers are improved with statins, AZT, metformin and cancer drugs but they are not necessarily correlated with beneficial survival outcomes and often make outcomes worse.

2. Use relative instead of absolute efficacy to overemphasise the benefits of treatment. Use absolute instead of relative efficacy for harms of treatment to underemphasise adverse effects.

3. Compare drug or treatment, not against placebo, but against another commonly used drug. Once a treatment such as chemo or radiotherapy, drug or vaccine has been introduced it becomes impossible to test its actual benefit against placebo, as the withholding of treatment is thought to be unethical.

4. Compare drug against another drug administered in an inappropriately high or inappropriately low dose.

5. Use a fauxcebo, for example, to test a vaccine against a heavy metal containing adjuvant, to mask toxic effect of treatment. The Astra Zeneca Covid vaccine was tested against the meningitis jab, which not only added another variable, but also masked adverse events.

6. Categorise serious events, such as Maddie de Garay, in the Pfizer trial, who now must be fed through a tube, as unserious, for example in de Garay’s case, she was categorised as having stomach issues.

7. Fraudulently manipulate data, for example, include the results of an unblinded group as part of the blinded group or children as part of an adult study. Eject people with adverse events in the treatment arm out of the study. Leave out adverse events such as deaths from the results and only include them in an appendix. Lax laboratory practice, mislabelling specimens.

8. Hide adverse events or illness in the vaccinated by classifying them as unvaccinated for weeks after vaccination.

9. Don’t tell people that drugs are only effective in a small number of people who take them, for example cancer therapy drugs with strong side-effects only have beneficial outcomes in a small percentage of people.

10. Don’t tell people the effects of long term use of drugs for example anti-inflammatory drugs can completely destroy adrenal function, and hypertension drugs which can completely destroy kidney function.

11. Don’t tell people that giving antibiotics to babies and children as a ‘precaution’, may cause allergies, asthma and eczema to develop.

12. Categorised drugs as 'life saving’ if they extend life by a few months, weeks or even days. For example the median life extension of highly nauseating cancer chemotherapy drugs is 2.1 months.

13. Disease monger, for example the medicalisation of normal childhood behaviour and use ineffective and harmful drugs for ADHD, depression and mental illnesses in all ages to cause more ‘disease’.

14. Keep the repeating the illogic and non-science of ‘viruses’ or bacteria being the cause of disease

15. Stigmatise natural healers and those who chose not vaccinate or have chemotherapy or other treatments as irresponsible, dangerous hippies

16. Any I’ve missed?

Now all these are being used globally by the WHO not just within nations. And the WHO is very, very corrupt.

We’re in big trouble.

🐒