We don't need a revolution, we need feminism.
War is a cause and a consequence of the inequality between men and women.
I think the trouble with war is that it's so male.
The inequality between men and women and the suppression of women is both a cause and a consequence of the West continuing to exert itself with militarism, creating war and blowing people up.
Before anyone says; Nuland, Clinton H, Baerbock and Von de Leyen do not represent equality between men and women and they have to be twice as war hawkish as men to succeed under the patriarchy. These women represent the same phenomena as successful brown people, such as Sunak and Braverman in the UK, who pull up the ladder after themselves and take the hardest possible line on immigration.
The patriarchy has also equated the word feminism with ball breaker.
We don't need a revolution. We need an equal number men and women in high profile public service, aka in power and instead of patriarchal suppression of women (and of course men!) we need feminism.
🐒
Why are there no nice people at the heart of the Empire? Because we’re all brought up under white western patriarchy that punishes ‘weakness’, compassion, fear and tears and rewards heartless dominance (or submission) over other animals, non-whites and women, instead of valuing mutual respect and co-operation. This fact that I have to explain what feminism is and isn’t shows the extent of the propaganda.
What is needed is people who are not graduates of the Russell group of universities or better still, not university graduates at all.
These universities are very good at churning out clones, and it makes little difference if graduates are women, members of 'minorities' etc. They all think alike and unfortunately they dominate all our institutions.
Capability should always be the criterion, not race or gender.