Why is the West Midlands police chief being thrown under the bus for banning violent racists?
Because US interests want to depose leaders who get in the way of their profits.
BBC news says
‘Earlier this month, West Midlands Police Chief Constable Craig Guildford was called to give evidence to the home affairs select committee for a second time. MPs had been less than impressed with his first appearance.
Guildford denied there was any conspiracy to ban Maccabi fans.
But MPs were astonished to discover that information gathered before the scheduled match in Birmingham contained “high confidence intelligence” about “elements of the community in [the] West Midlands wanting to ‘arm’ themselves’” and target Maccabi fans.
Asked why this information had not been made public, the chief constable said to the consternation of MPs that it was because “he wasn’t asked about it” before.
Questioned about any political pressure he came under, the police chief said the force had spoken to the local independent MP Ayoub Khan, who had called for the game to be cancelled or relocated, and had consulted local mosques about the decision. He said the force would speak to MPs all the time.
It also transpired that two councillors who opposed the fixture sat on the group which took the decision to ban away fans.
Khan told the Commons on Wednesday that the force had “never caved into community pressure” and described calls for Guildford to be sacked as a “witch hunt”.
But the home secretary was clear she believes this episode has damaged community relations, while the report criticises the force for not consulting the local Jewish community before coming to a decision.
West Midlands Police tried to explain the lack of consultation away by saying it was out of respect for the Jewish festival days around the time the decision was being made.
On that, the head of the police inspectorate is unequivocal in his report, writing: “I don’t accept this.”
Jewish community organisations have felt let down by police forces nationally since the period after the 7 October attacks.
They believe the police have been too timid in confronting the verbal and physical threats they have faced, and think the threat posed to Jews by violent Islamists needs to be tackled more forcefully.
The government’s independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall QC (sic), said on Tuesday that he had “lost count of the times that hatred against Israelis has been stirred up on British streets”, and that “the demonisation of Israelis matters because it is a vehicle for hatred of Jews”.
The report into the West Midlands Police finds there was no evidence to support the view that antisemitism played any part in the force’s decision to ban Maccabi fans.
However, it concluded the force overstated the threat posed by the Israeli fans and understated the risk posed to them.
As support ebbs away from the chief constable, how the decision to ban Maccabi fans was taken has revealed problems around inaccurate intelligence, the bungled use of AI, and failure to consult the community they police.In other words, this is not about a football match - it is about the integrity of British policing.’
‘Jonathan Hall KC is an independent barrister based in London, appointed by the Home Secretary as the UK’s fourth Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation in 2019. In 2024 he was in addition appointed as the UK’s first Independent Reviewer of State Threats Legislation. He has published 5 annual reports on UK terrorism legislation, freestanding reports on how prisons and probation should manage terrorist risk offenders, and numerous papers on current terrorism issues such as terrorism and protests, and the position of former British residents who went to fight for Islamic State/Da’esh. He is currently focussing in particular on the impact of AI and Large Language Models, and the issue of foreign interference.’ (apart from the CIA and NED)
What does all this mean?
Obviously that the threat is from AI (commonly used in simulations), people protesting genocide or people arming themselves to protect Muslims and Palestine supporters from attack by known racist and violent Maccabi fans and from ‘Islamists’ ie people allegedly wanting an Islamic state in the UK. The threat is not from Maccabi fans and has nothing to do with the genocide in Gaza that these fans openly celebrate.
It was the same with the report on the Pakistani rape gangs scandal, where lack of ethnicity data supposedly hampered police in their investigation of gangs known to them. The throwing under the bus of ‘Muslim led’ councils was timed to coincide with the ‘12 days war’ on Iran by US backed forces. This stirring of alleged (or real but deliberate) bungling by government and police who are supposedly in collusion with terrorists and ‘Islamists’ wanting to destroy the white patriarchy and prevent Israeli fans from supporting their team thus upsetting local Jews, couldn’t be better timed.
The US based forces of fossil fuels and arms would like to stir some fear and hatred of so-called Islamists being privileged over Jews, Christians and Christmas and white people at this time because they want to depose democratically elected leaders who dare to nationalise their own countries’ oil, continue to trade with China, US enemy number one, and to stand up to US hegemony.
🐒
Why **should** the police consult the Jewish community before making decisions about public safety? Why should they consult the British Jewish community before making decisions about public safety risks stemming from foreign nationals who are Jewish?
These demands for identity group domination of public policy have to stop.
Why is noone in the police or Parliament putting their foot down about this? Nothing the Jewish community could say, would alter the public safety risk. If the "Jewish community" says it would, then effectively they are saying that Jews obey Jews but don't obey the law of the land. And they are demanding that the police give their authority over to the Jewish community when that community demands it.
Vladimir Jabotinsky tried this in Palestine in 1920. The British police at that time had the stones to say no. But the "Jewish community" hasn't stopped trying.
In 1920, Jabotinsky aimed to replace the British police with armed Jewish Zionists whom he'd been illegally training. Be certain that if today's British establishment caves to demands for the Jewish community to be consulted about public safety and policing of Jewish lawbreakers, a subsequent development will be an attempt to elevate their existing Chabad "patrols" (gangs of thugs who serve the interests of Jews) into a policing role that is outside the existing legitimation flowchart and doesn't answer to the British people, but has policing and evidentiary authority.