Donny, was mRNA technology ever going to be a good idea? That's a hard no Georgie.

And did crybaby- virus, vaccine and pharma pusher- Robert Malone invent it?

Malone did not invent mRNA technology. That would be Mother Nature, Robert.

m(for messenger)RNA technology is merely trying to hijack incredibly complex and well balanced communication systems in cells. The homeostatic systems of the body stimulate genetic information to be transcribed (a highly regulated process) from chosen parts of the nuclear DNA into mRNA. This message is then sent to the cytoplasm to be read in the ribosomes, where transfer RNAs, each attached to an amino acid, translate the message into strings of amino acids, thus forming proteins.

As regards Malone and mRNA technology there is really only this 1989 paper where cationic (the surface has been positively charged with ions) lipids were used to get synthetic luciferase mRNA into cells in culture to make the cells produce luciferase in a dose wise manner Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection.

Observing that charged lipids can be used to get something across the lipid bilayer of the cell membrane is bit like observing that detergents break down surface tension and can be used for cleaning things The observer didn’t invent detergents, nor cationic lipids, nor mRNA.

Getting something into a cell in culture by directly applying it to the surface and it being translated is a world away from getting it into a cell by injecting a whole living being. I think that's why we've heard nothing more. It’s a waste of time and money.

mRNA is fragile, if probably lasts only a few minutes before it’s broken down. The synthetic mRNA in the jabs has been renamed by some modRNA, it has allegedly been modified for longevity by somehow resisting breakdown by RNAase, though no one can know how long the modRNA lasts because its presence in the body cannot be detected, the longevity claim is unfounded. No one knows if it's in the jabs, if there’s enough, if it can survive long enough to be translated into so called 'spike' proteins, if the body is fooled into translating it, if these proteins form properly, nor if the body will not just destroy the mRNA or the proteins.

The pseudo-uridine substitute for natural uridine apparently makes for more errors in the making of the synthetic mRNA. There may also be DNA and plasmid contaminant of the jabs. DNA may be inserted into the human genome and antibiotic resistance genes may be passed on to bacteria in the body.

As regards using mRNA tech for cancer therapy, I would say that cancer, like ‘mental illness’ symptoms, is a healthy and sane response to a toxic and insane environment. The causes of cancer, suppressed emotions, environmental toxins, radiation and malnutrition are not removed by making a number of cells produce a certain protein, even if that were possible. The interactions and positive and negative feedbacks within and without our bodies, between our emotions, food, microbiome, enzymes and each other, plants and animals is way too complicated and beyond our comprehension, to even think about fiddling with it or thinking we know better.

The homeostatic systems of the body have been finely tuned over millennia and they know what they are doing. They need to be supported not suppressed as there will always unforeseen outcomes. Leave them alone.

And stop abusing animals in useless experiments.

And stop spending fortunes on research for products only available to a few until all humans has enough nutritious food to eat as well as clean air and clean drinking water.

🐒