This history of humans 'doing chemistry' is very long and strange to be sure. It created alchemy, the idea of it was still being pursued well into the 18th century. It created Rockefellers 'institutes' (prostitutes?) I am glad to know there are humans like you who see it for what it is, a gun in the hands of a child. Best from OR
Wikipedia: In fiction, a MacGuffin (sometimes McGuffin) is an object, device, or event that is necessary to the plot and the motivation of the characters, but insignificant, unimportant, or irrelevant in itself.
Think of it this way: imagine you're a eugenics-obsessed billionaire supervillain who wants to erect a technocratic control grid to micromanage the lives of billions of people around the planet. How do you actually go about doing that? Do you simply announce yourself as ruler of the world and threaten to destroy the planet if you don't get your way? Of course not. That's comic book supervillain-level thinking.
No, you invent a MacGuffin as a pretext so that the masses can delude themselves into thinking that you're taking over the planet in order to save it.
Hiya I think I understand the plot device, like Dicken's the mystery of Edwin Drood, a character that every one looks for but is actually not real or irrelevant. I was just wondering if a MacGuffin was a similarly important but irrelevant character in an actual novel - or someone just made it up one day.
"According to Hillman, the electron microscopist is looking at an unnatural "mask", usually composed of osmic acid. He argues that some of the things seen through the electron microscope could not really exist in living cells. In other words, they are artefacts of the process for preparing cells for the electron microscope. Among the structures which Hillman says do not exist in life include the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi body, ribosomes and synaptic vesicles (and lots of other complicated sounding objects)."
Also this is a somewhat unrelated bonus I found yesterday. Pretty mindblowing if true.
mRNA was invented in the Soviet Union in 1981. Malone surely assisted with developing and testing bioweapons, including the "covid" injections and the mRNA for later use in controlled environments:
mRNA, however, might be closely related to the technocrats' self-defeating strategy:
In order to deliver mRNA into the body, hydrogel coating is needed. Happenstance, the same is true of the self-assembling nano-structures; they need the coating until they are anchored in the human (or animal) body and survive on bioelectricity.
I always wonder, where "fine tune over millennia" comes from. Shouldn't some living being break down and die if its systems do not work properly? How can anything that's not "fine tuned" yet survive to improve "the next time"?
Very good point. Isn't the concept that those with the improvements are more likely to survive, and yes, those individuals less well tuned die or don't reproduce. The species doesn't die out but unhelpful traits do?? But the bare essentials of survival must be present in all before it can be fine tuned in some so I have no idea how life happens or has evolved!
The evolution of multicellular organisms must involve changes in the genes of single cell organisms, if we believe that we have evolved from single cells. Our genes have been 'fine tuned' enough to have made a complex human that is now conscious that it's alive and is studying itself?
IF we believe that we "have evolved from a single cell". And how did dead matter "evolve" into a living cell? And who did ever see, record these "evolutions"?
This history of humans 'doing chemistry' is very long and strange to be sure. It created alchemy, the idea of it was still being pursued well into the 18th century. It created Rockefellers 'institutes' (prostitutes?) I am glad to know there are humans like you who see it for what it is, a gun in the hands of a child. Best from OR
mRNA is a MacGuffin.
Wikipedia: In fiction, a MacGuffin (sometimes McGuffin) is an object, device, or event that is necessary to the plot and the motivation of the characters, but insignificant, unimportant, or irrelevant in itself.
Does it have an original story it relates to I wonder?
See this
https://www.minds.com/CorbettReport/blog/what-hitchcock-taught-the-social-engineers-1332151485965799429
Think of it this way: imagine you're a eugenics-obsessed billionaire supervillain who wants to erect a technocratic control grid to micromanage the lives of billions of people around the planet. How do you actually go about doing that? Do you simply announce yourself as ruler of the world and threaten to destroy the planet if you don't get your way? Of course not. That's comic book supervillain-level thinking.
No, you invent a MacGuffin as a pretext so that the masses can delude themselves into thinking that you're taking over the planet in order to save it.
Hiya I think I understand the plot device, like Dicken's the mystery of Edwin Drood, a character that every one looks for but is actually not real or irrelevant. I was just wondering if a MacGuffin was a similarly important but irrelevant character in an actual novel - or someone just made it up one day.
The Corbett Link has some info. I only know the basics of it. Thanks
Yes, the mRNA jab is the MacGuffin ring of Power made by Sauron (Malone!)
One ring to rule them all,
one ring to find them,
One ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them.
We need to throw it back into mount doom
Does this mean we're living in Mordor?
Thank you 😺
From 1944 in Time Hitchcock says "The McGuffin is the thing the hero chases, the thing the picture is all about ... it is very necessary"
By no means original with Hitchcock, the McGuffin is a hoary British joke about a parcel-toting man on a train meeting another man, who inquires:
"What's in the parcel?"
"A McGuffin."
"What's a McGuffin?"
"A McGuffin is a small animal with a long, yellow, spotted tail, used for hunting tigers in New York."
"But there aren't any tigers in New York."
"Ah, but this isn't a real McGuffin."
Here's some more https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/07/that-mrna-vaccines-cause-cells-to-produce-spike-proteins-is-a-fairy-tale/
Another possible twist is https://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/89BRage.html
"According to Hillman, the electron microscopist is looking at an unnatural "mask", usually composed of osmic acid. He argues that some of the things seen through the electron microscope could not really exist in living cells. In other words, they are artefacts of the process for preparing cells for the electron microscope. Among the structures which Hillman says do not exist in life include the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi body, ribosomes and synaptic vesicles (and lots of other complicated sounding objects)."
Also this is a somewhat unrelated bonus I found yesterday. Pretty mindblowing if true.
https://truthcomestolight.com/michael-clarage-questioning-our-understanding-of-dna-the-electrical-shaping-of-biology/
Hiya, thank you yes I saw Scoglio and Torsten, the mRNA can't get into the cell
🙏🏽
mRNA was invented in the Soviet Union in 1981. Malone surely assisted with developing and testing bioweapons, including the "covid" injections and the mRNA for later use in controlled environments:
mRNA, however, might be closely related to the technocrats' self-defeating strategy:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-will-the-globalists-game-end
In order to deliver mRNA into the body, hydrogel coating is needed. Happenstance, the same is true of the self-assembling nano-structures; they need the coating until they are anchored in the human (or animal) body and survive on bioelectricity.
Its absolutely amazes me just how theory is talked as fact. And how much i used to swallow it without question.
I always wonder, where "fine tune over millennia" comes from. Shouldn't some living being break down and die if its systems do not work properly? How can anything that's not "fine tuned" yet survive to improve "the next time"?
Very good point. Isn't the concept that those with the improvements are more likely to survive, and yes, those individuals less well tuned die or don't reproduce. The species doesn't die out but unhelpful traits do?? But the bare essentials of survival must be present in all before it can be fine tuned in some so I have no idea how life happens or has evolved!
The evolution of multicellular organisms must involve changes in the genes of single cell organisms, if we believe that we have evolved from single cells. Our genes have been 'fine tuned' enough to have made a complex human that is now conscious that it's alive and is studying itself?
IF we believe that we "have evolved from a single cell". And how did dead matter "evolve" into a living cell? And who did ever see, record these "evolutions"?