28 Comments
User's avatar
Conway Judge's avatar

Money is only a middleman

You cannot eat it

It doesn't provide shelter

It is only a medium of exchange

And when you have more than you will ever need

It becomes entirely obsolete

What is really important

Is the control over the resources and labour

And money is only one way to get that

Just like a car might be how you get to work

But if you took it away

You realise you could walk.

Catch the bus.

Ride a bike

Hitchhike

Beg, borrow or steal.

Money is only a middleman

Expand full comment
Visceral Adventure's avatar

The jury is still out on this point. Sure, there are incentives in play that will propel a diseased system without anyone being at the helm. But at the same time, there does seem to be an awful amount of coincidental evidence pointing to certain people/organizations. Although, deep down I don’t think we know the actual names of the puppeteers, if there are any. Why would those people want to be anything but anonymous? And maybe they don’t all gather to talk policy in Davos, but instead have ways of communicating that wouldn’t be known to the rest of us because what good is money and power if you can’t even keep shit secret?

But I do agree that connecting to the earth, doing what is ours to do, empathy, etc is a winning strategy no matter if we’re fighting some cabal or simply correcting the course of humanity.

Expand full comment
Jenny Joy's avatar

An important distinction to make indeed! I like the way you articulated it.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Thank you Jen xxx

Expand full comment
Decaf's avatar

Good analysis.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Thank you 🙏🏽

Expand full comment
The BarefootHealer's avatar

"A One World Government would put power in the hands of just a few companies with monopolies, rather than having many able to compete for markets across the world."

🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Um. Go look up Blackrock. Then go look up Vangaurd. Then choose any other company (of significant turnover and listed). Then lookup who owns shares in chosen company. It will either be Blackrock OR Vanguard or both.

Then go look up McKinsey and Company. They provide consultants for companies/governments/ military/private businesses and individuals. They are a private company of approximately 1300-1800 partners. They are worldwide. They have no head office.

Then look at the work that McKinsey has done for B&V.

I would think that it is actually quite likely that your assessment on the likelyhood of a "one world government", is a tad redundant.😉 BTJMO

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

good point. agreed, both global and globalist agendas are for a one world government in. the sense that we already. have one.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 20, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Previous generations thought that resources would run out if the population continued to increase, which didn't turn out to be the case.

Emancipation and education of women does lower the birth rate, is anyone going to argue against them? The population will stop increasing if all nations continue in this trend. We will have to adapt to a shrinking population, but apparently humans are good at adapting.

Expand full comment
David S's avatar

My feelings as well about Gates. HIs grandfather was definitely a eugenicist.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 20, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

No. For me it is all about money and propaganda by the right wing opposed to restriction, and immigration, created by colonialism and neo-colonialism.

The Globalist theorists lose all credibility for me when they repost pictures of Chile saying they are DEWs in Maui enforcing 15 minute cities and reposting edited videos of YNH with captions saying 'chief advisor to Klaus Schwab'. He is not.

American imperialism has allowed fascists to dominate Ukraine who wish to divide Russia up, yes. they are being used as an army for NATO/US who also wish this.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 20, 2023Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Thank you,

Yes, exactly, Harai is warning what might happen if we don't have rules of play for the AI and surveillance industries. The algorithm will eventually be controlling employment and business decisions and no human will understand it. Those who control surveillance will know what we are all thinking and feeling, especially the elites who will be even more watched that anyone else. He is making very good sense of how industry should be controlled, which is why I think he has been smeared and insulted. I've been posting that Davos 2020 video for the past three years https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG6WnMb9Fho&t=3s because Whitney Webb got it completely wrong and said that YNH/WEF sees us plebs as rats, he's not saying that at all. He's saying we may all end up as rats.

I think the strategy has been to get people to campaign to allow global industries even greater freedom (particularly oil and animal ag) but also AI, surveillance, arms and pharma are doing very well, which may well destroy the human the spirit and the human race.

Expand full comment
David S's avatar

I agree Jo. When I first watched YNH, I was aghast. Then I saw him with Russell Brand. They spoke for two hours. My view of him totally changed. However, I have read that his book Sapiens is not a very scholarly work. Thoughts on that?

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Hiya David, I thought Sapiens was really good and summed up our current position in the world very well. Not sure if scholarly or not. Wasn't bothered if it wasn't!

Expand full comment
David S's avatar

I'd heard that he misinterpreted scientific data. But the source might have been prejudiced. Now I'll have to go read it and decide for myself. Thanks Jo.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

AI, 5G, mRNA therapy and surveillance are facts of life and technological 'progess' . They do not inherently have an agenda nor an outcome. We may indeed oppose them on safety and efficacy grounds. The Luddites thought that spinning jennies would destroy their lives, They undoubtedly changed them. Was the industrial revolution itself all part of globalist agenda?

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

"Was the industrial revolution itself all part of globalist agenda?"

Yes and no. It has two sides as always, God's and Satan's. Satan wants to corrupt and destroy, God wants peace and harmony. Satan and his minions mess things up, God and His people (all those of good heart) step in to sort out the mess.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 20, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
David S's avatar

I Agree Marc. It may or may not be nefarious but there's a lot of hubris in the Davos crowd. Also, if they're not preparing for depopulation and spoilation of the eco-systems, then why are they building underground bunkers with AI tech to survive the coming ecological disasters?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 24, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
David S's avatar

I saw a documentary recently that was an eye opener for me. I'm not one for conspiracy theories Marc, but seeing these multi-million dollar bunkers was scary. Growing food, AI robots waste disposal systems. self sustaining energy generation for years. It really makes you wonder what they know. Or are they like the folks who have bomb shelters with guns and canned food but just with a lot more money. Maybe.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Well said. A quarter rather than a half of the world was coloured pink on the maps. And mRNA is fit only for the dustbin in my books.

Expand full comment