What is the evidence for ‘nuclear’ powered weapons?
‘Many of the nuclear explosion videos we have all seen and presumed real are shown to be complete fakes using model trees, houses and cars exploding on a set.’ Admede.
The camera is often between the explosion and the trajectory of its devastation yet is able to carry on filming!
‘The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki appear not to be the result of one large explosion, but rather the result of a fire-bombing campaign comparable in pictures to Tokyo’s fire-bombed remains (below).’
‘Hiroshima and Nagasaki also never experienced anything like the hundreds or thousands of years of radiation predicted by nuclear scientists, in fact, vegetation began growing within a month after the bombing, and the Japanese people began rebuilding almost immediately.’
All explosions leave some residual radioactivity. In the aftermath of the fire bombing the babies of Hiroshima showed birth defects similar to ‘rubella’; these could have been caused by maternal stress, vaccines or toxins and birth defects have not continued down through the generations.
Some nuclear physicists even claim that nuclear weaponry must be fraudulent based solely on the technical impossibilities of preventing fission material from incineration before triggering the necessary nuclear chain reaction.
The power of nuclear energy is a small reaction heating water and making vast amounts of steam, which generates the energy. This amount of energy could therefore not be contained in a nuclear warhead.
Military tests on nuclear bombs used TNT as controls. Isotopes were added to the controls to mimic what a nuclear explosion might look like. Two groups of military personnel were told that they were the ones placing the TNT control and that the other was placing the nuclear bomb.Very few people actually saw the explosions as they were told to keep their eyes shut.
The very first implosion of plutonium bomb, called Trinity, took place in Mexico in the Jornada del Muerto, Journey of the Dead (very atmospheric and deliberately chosen) involving hundreds of scientists and soldiers. Stills from the video footage, which is clearly composited and sensationalised below. Despite all the technical details that could have gone wrong- it apparently succeeded the first time- this is very unusual.
The explosion is allegedly far away and large, although it could be closer and smaller. Mushroom clouds are not unique to ‘nuclear’ explosions, so this could have been a conventional explosion. The non-nuclear, conventional bomb Blue 82 was the final bomb on Vietnam and created an enormous cloud and crater.
Please read this brilliant and funny take down by Miles Mathis. Possibly scientists and others were convinced to fake nuclear explosions, if they couldn’t actually create them and went along with the ‘nuclear’ scenario for America, freedom, deterrence and peace.
The caption for the photo above reads ‘Major General Leslie Groves and Robert Oppenheimer at the Trinity shot tower remains a few weeks later.’ The white overshoes (in the absence of any other protective clothing or equipment whatsoever) were to prevent the trinitite fallout from sticking to the soles of their shoes.
I will give you a few moments to stop laughing
Would the elites put themselves and their children at potential risk of nuclear war and fallout when they could relieve us of £trillions for a fake deterrent by using films and media instead? The need not to give away classified nuclear information to other countries in the nuclear race facilitated the hoax by the apparent need for secrecy, which coincided with the continued rise of the secret services.
A lucrative industry in nuclear waste transportation and disposal in the ocean is unnecessary and may be a way for the state to bury the bodies. Nuclear energy could be made in small local reactors very cheaply. The gamma radiation from uranium seems to be blocked just by a human body. Uranium itself is insoluble and indigestible and may not be as hazardous thought. Depleted uranium makes fire sparks on impact and when made into bullets can destroy tanks, not because of the radioactivity but because of the velocity and fire.
It has been repeated many times that Marie Curie died of radiation poisoning. She died at age 66 in 1934 of aplastic anaemia which can also be caused by antibiotics and exposure to benzene.
Was safe, clean and effective nuclear power smeared, sabotaged and dumped because of pressure from the super powerful oil, gas and coal industries? A good run down here.
Belief in technology and science to save us will keep the powerful in positions of power. We do not need to be saved. We need to see through the illusions used to scare and control us.
🐒
This is easy to accept because my gut has been telling me for a while that the whole China thing is theater as is the threat of nuclear war over Ukraine. It's the top dogs having long ago decided that it's win-win for all of them if they can just control their own people and use each other as the bad guy in the scenario. But this may be why Putin wants out of the NWO, because he feels the other top dogs are going to nullify the agreement and put him on the outs.
And this is why I keep saying they'll never release a deadly virus. (I'm still not convinced about the virus thing being non-existent, but I am convinced it's a non-issue.)
If anything, we can count on these people being more afraid than we are.
This is always a topic of mass controversy... nicely covered :)