PS. The fact that I still have to explain what patriarchy and feminism are says a lot. Patriarchy is not more men in power. Feminism is not more women in power.
Patriarchy is the conditioning that we’re all brought up under that conditions us to reward dominance (or submission) over women, non-Whites, other animals and nature, which is seen as separate to humanity.
Eco-feminism is the system which rewards people, regardless of their sex or ethnicity, for doing their jobs. For uniting instead of actively dividing. For healing instead of actively keeping people fat, sick and on drugs with disease-mongering, vaccines, drugs, junk food and animal products. For working within nature instead of trying to control it with genetic modification and disastrous green revolutions. For working for peace instead of actively creating proxy war. For promoting community instead of isolating to promote loneliness, alcoholism and gambling. For supporting Haiti instead of keeping it poor and punishing it for gaining independence from Whites…
PPS The age adjusted death rate in the West has been declining, and longevity increasing, since WW2, with a small blip in 2020/21. The fertility rate declines as childhood mortality, GDP and the education and emancipation of women rises. However, the fertility rate could rise again at any point to avert extinction and economies can easily adapt to having less people, it's not a bad thing. Globally there is no depopulation, 71 million extra humans last year, thanks to the Global South. People worried about human ‘depopulation’ are worried about the proportion of White people in it.
I'm not good at English. I find your article very informative. In 2015, MERS broke out and a small pandemic was underway here. At the time, health authorities changed health regulations to allow wearing masks, restricting movement, and sending text messages containing the movements of confirmed cases. Ultimately, confirmed cases of the 2020 coronavirus were quickly identified in South Korea. It was quickly confirmed worldwide. In 2015, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency and the International Vaccine Institute began cooperation to develop mRNA vaccines. The 2015 health regulations were applied globally.
The topic of misogyny influences young voters. And young male voters who are interested in feminist topics are being isolated by the algorithms of YouTube and portal searches.
In 2015, a new anthrax alternative appeared at the U.S. military base in Yongsan, a small city. The MERS virus we knew was mistaken for anthrax. This led to the political situation in Korea. A conservative female president was quickly impeached. The next progressive president has been elected. K-culture has become popular around the world. When the pandemic began, Korea's drive-thru and health regulations were immediately applied globally.
Korean conservatives often cover up the truth about vaccines by mentioning the issue of election fraud and mixing in various real-life conspiracy theories. By mixing facts and lies, people are denied access to the truth.
Hello line of symbols, Yes it is possible and very easy. The researchers took some people and some mice who exhibited common symptoms of detoxification. They then labelled some proteins or RNA sequences that are produced by the body as part of this healing process and then took some pretty pictures of them.
I am glad to see that you didn't abandon substack after all. You provide an interesting alternative take. Even if I don't agree with everything you say at least you provide food for thought which is more than can be said for most political commentary.
I think the real source of the world's ills is the worship of the economy, embraced by both the left and the right. If you replace the p with an o and rearrange the letters gdp = god. Its the single stupidest ideology that has ever been invented. At least with Islam you end up with 72 virgins. With Gdpism all you get is a mountain of useless junk paid for with global warming, the destruction of the ecosystem, abuse of animals and tedious lives of quiet desperation.
(in the face of non-existent depopulation)... if you were to lookup the population figures for the planet you would find that in the wealthy, industrialized, urbanized countries; depopulation is a real phenomenon. Fertility of 2.1 children per female is the requirement for a stationary population. All the world's wealthy, industrialized, urbanized countries are currently stationary or decreasing. Those countries experiencing increasing size are mostly in Africa and South America. As societies become urbanized, Fertlity declines. The reasons for this decline are another discussion.
You're messing up all your words. Deliberate depopulation is not happening. The fertility rate declines as childhood mortality, GDP and the education and emancipation of women rises. The fertility rate could rise again at any point to avert extinction. Economies could easily adapt to having less people, it's not a bad thing. Globally there is no depolulation, 71 million extra humans last year, thanks to the Global South.
You are making the usual mistakes of the amateur in deep water. As in all disciplines there is a jargon which is specific to demography. You clearly do not have the jargon. I do. I taught it for decades. There is no such thing as "fertility rate" in the discipline of demography. You do not seem to know this. The three basic concepts upon which all of demography is based are: 1) fertility 2)mortality 3) migration.
Everything else is derived from these. From here on it can become complicated. There is little to no connection between age specific mortality and what you call "fertility rate."
I agree with your claim that fake issues have been created as distractions. They are straw men which the political right shoots down with glee. An old debater's trick.
Piss off know-all. Your nit picking doesn't change the demographics. 'Fertility rate' is commonly used to describe the balance of births v deaths when not greatly affected by migration, such as in China, where the fertility rate has been decreasing for the reasons I gave above.
Globally of course there is no migration and the population is still increasing.
Age specific mortality? Is this referring to the age adjusted death rate? Yes, an ageing population is more likely to die so it is compared to a standard age range profile to show that in the West the death rate has been declining (and life expectancy increasing) since WW2, with a little blip in 2020/21.
PS. The fact that I still have to explain what patriarchy and feminism are says a lot. Patriarchy is not more men in power. Feminism is not more women in power.
Patriarchy is the conditioning that we’re all brought up under that conditions us to reward dominance (or submission) over women, non-Whites, other animals and nature, which is seen as separate to humanity.
Eco-feminism is the system which rewards people, regardless of their sex or ethnicity, for doing their jobs. For uniting instead of actively dividing. For healing instead of actively keeping people fat, sick and on drugs with disease-mongering, vaccines, drugs, junk food and animal products. For working within nature instead of trying to control it with genetic modification and disastrous green revolutions. For working for peace instead of actively creating proxy war. For promoting community instead of isolating to promote loneliness, alcoholism and gambling. For supporting Haiti instead of keeping it poor and punishing it for gaining independence from Whites…
PPS The age adjusted death rate in the West has been declining, and longevity increasing, since WW2, with a small blip in 2020/21. The fertility rate declines as childhood mortality, GDP and the education and emancipation of women rises. However, the fertility rate could rise again at any point to avert extinction and economies can easily adapt to having less people, it's not a bad thing. Globally there is no depopulation, 71 million extra humans last year, thanks to the Global South. People worried about human ‘depopulation’ are worried about the proportion of White people in it.
미군이 탄저균을 은폐하던 시기와 메르스가 등장한 시기는 같다.
I'm not good at English. I find your article very informative. In 2015, MERS broke out and a small pandemic was underway here. At the time, health authorities changed health regulations to allow wearing masks, restricting movement, and sending text messages containing the movements of confirmed cases. Ultimately, confirmed cases of the 2020 coronavirus were quickly identified in South Korea. It was quickly confirmed worldwide. In 2015, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency and the International Vaccine Institute began cooperation to develop mRNA vaccines. The 2015 health regulations were applied globally.
The topic of misogyny influences young voters. And young male voters who are interested in feminist topics are being isolated by the algorithms of YouTube and portal searches.
Even in Korea, conservatives hate women. Conservatives often dominate anti-vaccine topics, causing opponents to dismiss them as conspiracy theories.
In 2015, a new anthrax alternative appeared at the U.S. military base in Yongsan, a small city. The MERS virus we knew was mistaken for anthrax. This led to the political situation in Korea. A conservative female president was quickly impeached. The next progressive president has been elected. K-culture has become popular around the world. When the pandemic began, Korea's drive-thru and health regulations were immediately applied globally.
Korean conservatives often cover up the truth about vaccines by mentioning the issue of election fraud and mixing in various real-life conspiracy theories. By mixing facts and lies, people are denied access to the truth.
Do you think it is possible to refute this thesis? please. https://rupress.org/jem/article/218/3/e20202135/211674/Neuroinvasion-of-SARS-CoV-2-in-human-and-mouse
They say the virus exists because of this experiment. Virus creation is suspected.
Hello line of symbols, Yes it is possible and very easy. The researchers took some people and some mice who exhibited common symptoms of detoxification. They then labelled some proteins or RNA sequences that are produced by the body as part of this healing process and then took some pretty pictures of them.
Hope this helps.
thank you
I am glad to see that you didn't abandon substack after all. You provide an interesting alternative take. Even if I don't agree with everything you say at least you provide food for thought which is more than can be said for most political commentary.
I think the real source of the world's ills is the worship of the economy, embraced by both the left and the right. If you replace the p with an o and rearrange the letters gdp = god. Its the single stupidest ideology that has ever been invented. At least with Islam you end up with 72 virgins. With Gdpism all you get is a mountain of useless junk paid for with global warming, the destruction of the ecosystem, abuse of animals and tedious lives of quiet desperation.
(in the face of non-existent depopulation)... if you were to lookup the population figures for the planet you would find that in the wealthy, industrialized, urbanized countries; depopulation is a real phenomenon. Fertility of 2.1 children per female is the requirement for a stationary population. All the world's wealthy, industrialized, urbanized countries are currently stationary or decreasing. Those countries experiencing increasing size are mostly in Africa and South America. As societies become urbanized, Fertlity declines. The reasons for this decline are another discussion.
You're messing up all your words. Deliberate depopulation is not happening. The fertility rate declines as childhood mortality, GDP and the education and emancipation of women rises. The fertility rate could rise again at any point to avert extinction. Economies could easily adapt to having less people, it's not a bad thing. Globally there is no depolulation, 71 million extra humans last year, thanks to the Global South.
You are making the usual mistakes of the amateur in deep water. As in all disciplines there is a jargon which is specific to demography. You clearly do not have the jargon. I do. I taught it for decades. There is no such thing as "fertility rate" in the discipline of demography. You do not seem to know this. The three basic concepts upon which all of demography is based are: 1) fertility 2)mortality 3) migration.
Everything else is derived from these. From here on it can become complicated. There is little to no connection between age specific mortality and what you call "fertility rate."
I agree with your claim that fake issues have been created as distractions. They are straw men which the political right shoots down with glee. An old debater's trick.
Piss off know-all. Your nit picking doesn't change the demographics. 'Fertility rate' is commonly used to describe the balance of births v deaths when not greatly affected by migration, such as in China, where the fertility rate has been decreasing for the reasons I gave above.
Globally of course there is no migration and the population is still increasing.
Age specific mortality? Is this referring to the age adjusted death rate? Yes, an ageing population is more likely to die so it is compared to a standard age range profile to show that in the West the death rate has been declining (and life expectancy increasing) since WW2, with a little blip in 2020/21.
You add nothing to the discussion.
Your words are a combination of word salad and uncalled for base rudeness. Common enough on the internet.
Still in denial and pushing hearts and flowers view of the ruling class / conspiracy?
So feminism is hearts and flowers and part of the conspiracy of the globalist rulers.
So you are threatened by feminism and not globalism.
So the ruling class are not the White western patriarchy?- wake the fuck up!
No. Feminism is fine. I was thinking about Climate Change. The policy you support to combat it means mass murder!