Ffs it's just all so ridiculous... imaging an 80% killer virus into being coz you poisoned and terrorised a bunch of mice in cages. And all the Virus Pushers Against Clot Shotters are all over it coz Captain Kirsch says so. Sigh.
J Couey has been making the same point - fear of lab created viruses is still coming from the narrative that will trap us and take away our freedoms (although he thinks viruses exists).
You've probably seen these recent articles on James Lyons-Weiler's substack, all just in the last 2 weeks. I've included the titles with the links so that you can get the flavor without having to click the links. The bitter flavor may well be enough.
The amusing part is that his organization, the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK), has just announced that it "Will Be Developing and Offering a Formal Course in Logic and Reason":
"Over 500,000 Pubmed articles mention "VIRUS" and "control group" or "control samples" or "negative control" or "positive control""
[This one was perhaps the silliest. I pointed out that a Pubmed search for "vaccines AND 'safe and effective'" gives almost 4000 results. So, it's settled then!]
Similar fearmongering is the repetition in the "health freedom" community about ADE and how "all the ferrets died [when they were re-exposed to the alleged virus]." Having seen, thanks to your article, how rubbish the "80%" lethality figure is in this gain-of-fiction study, I now wonder about the oft-mentioned ferrets. Were they also just killed by the experimenter per study protocol? Or were they killed by the experimental vaccine itself, not due to exposure to any "virus" (but with the re-exposure explanation providing a way to hide the poisonous nature of the vaccine)?
I would like to read it for myself (very dangerous, could lead to conspiracy thinking and other mental derangements). Do you happen to know the reference to this study?
Yet Omicron-infected mice with the same chemicals displayed little to no signs of clinical illness, while the health of those infected with WT and Omi-S rapidly deteriorated.
Ffs it's just all so ridiculous... imaging an 80% killer virus into being coz you poisoned and terrorised a bunch of mice in cages. And all the Virus Pushers Against Clot Shotters are all over it coz Captain Kirsch says so. Sigh.
J Couey has been making the same point - fear of lab created viruses is still coming from the narrative that will trap us and take away our freedoms (although he thinks viruses exists).
They're manipulating something horribly deadly and yet they show all relaxed and smillling in the press photos.
Sometimes common sense is all you need.
Yup. Many excellent points here!
You've probably seen these recent articles on James Lyons-Weiler's substack, all just in the last 2 weeks. I've included the titles with the links so that you can get the flavor without having to click the links. The bitter flavor may well be enough.
The amusing part is that his organization, the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK), has just announced that it "Will Be Developing and Offering a Formal Course in Logic and Reason":
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/ipak-edu-will-be-developing-and-offering
Here's the list of articles:
"Is Geert Right? Let's Hope Not."
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/is-geert-right-lets-hope-not
"Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2"
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/endonuclease-fingerprint-indicates
"Science, Public Health Policy & the Law has Accepted Dr. Sin Hang Lee's Study of the Flaws of Non-Quantitative RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2…"
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/science-public-health-policy-and
Hammond Answers Cowan's "Five Simple Questions for Virologists" [how I found the Hammond post]
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/hammond-answers-five-simple-questions
"Astounding Discovery! Sanger Sequencing and Mass-Spectrometry Agree on SARS-CoV-2 Protein Sequences From NGS!"
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/astounding-discovery-sanger-sequencing
"Over 500,000 Pubmed articles mention "VIRUS" and "control group" or "control samples" or "negative control" or "positive control""
[This one was perhaps the silliest. I pointed out that a Pubmed search for "vaccines AND 'safe and effective'" gives almost 4000 results. So, it's settled then!]
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/over-500000-pubmed-articles-mention
"Pathogenic Priming, My Predicted Nightmare"
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/pathogenic-priming-my-predicted-nightmare
"SARS-CoV-2-like Spike Protein Sequences with Affinity to hACE2 Were Present in the Public Databases in 2005. Plus, a Hint on SARS-CoV-2…"
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/sars-cov-2-like-spike-protein-sequences
"Yet Another Final, Respectful Response to Virus Denialism."
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/yet-another-final-respectful-response
Similar fearmongering is the repetition in the "health freedom" community about ADE and how "all the ferrets died [when they were re-exposed to the alleged virus]." Having seen, thanks to your article, how rubbish the "80%" lethality figure is in this gain-of-fiction study, I now wonder about the oft-mentioned ferrets. Were they also just killed by the experimenter per study protocol? Or were they killed by the experimental vaccine itself, not due to exposure to any "virus" (but with the re-exposure explanation providing a way to hide the poisonous nature of the vaccine)?
I would like to read it for myself (very dangerous, could lead to conspiracy thinking and other mental derangements). Do you happen to know the reference to this study?
Yet Omicron-infected mice with the same chemicals displayed little to no signs of clinical illness, while the health of those infected with WT and Omi-S rapidly deteriorated.
Another recent article in the recent flood of "viral" marketing (this one is from Jeremy Hammond):
https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2022/10/17/answering-tom-cowans-five-simple-questions-for-virologists/
For pointing out the many gaps in his arguments, I'm now banned from Hammond's site too:
https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2022/10/17/answering-tom-cowans-five-simple-questions-for-virologists/#comments/400829