Philadelphia 2023

A new drug market.

There’s been a lot of excitement and nonsense about this Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination recently.

Academic science deliberately or ignorantly seems to get the wrong end of the stick about almost everything to do with infectious disease.

We must ask ourselves why was this study funded and by whom? What was it designed to show? Why do they want us to read it? Why is it getting reposted on ‘freedom’ media? What are they trying to sell? There is always something to buy.

‘Here, we report that several months after the second vaccination, SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were increasingly composed of non-inflammatory IgG4, which were further boosted by a third mRNA vaccination and/or SARS-CoV-2 variant breakthrough infections. IgG4 antibodies among all spike-specific IgG antibodies rose on average from 0.04% shortly after the second vaccination to 19.27% late after the third vaccination (or healing event).

‘This induction of (spike specific) IgG4 antibodies was not observed after homologous or heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with adenoviral vectors.’

In contrast to the mRNA the ‘adenovirus’ jabs are the contents of cell cultures, which may contain the ‘spike’ protein which is producing by stressing cells. Injecting cell cultures will of course cause inflammation and inflammatory cells to be produced as well as the production of ‘neutralising’ antibodies which appear to reduce ‘viral activity’ in cell cultures.

In reality these antibodies are merely interacting with proteins produced by stressing cell cultures. Repeated injection with mRNA jabs or cell cultures (homologous) or repeated injection with a mixture of mRNA and cell cultures jabs (heterologous) will of course cause different responses in inflammatory cells.

Featuring only 67 people; those with the highest IgG4 titres had not only been vaccinated but had gone through a detox episode; most of the participants had also had a ‘breakthrough SARS2 infection’. They would absolutely be expected to produce ‘non-inflammatory’ immunoglobulins in high titre during the convalescent phase; these bind to reactive proteins and restore homeostasis. This has been known since the work of Pebbles and Enders in 1954 working on the so-called measles virus. IgG’s (to cellular proteins involved in stimulating inflammation and detox) are produced in up to 30 times the titre during the convalescent phase compared to baseline. It was not explained if the third inject with adenovirus vector, either homologous or heterologous, cohort also had ‘breakthrough infections’ aka healing events or not, if they didn’t this would explain the absence of non-inflammatory antibodies months after.

The different immunoglobulins (Igs) such as A,M and G, and different classes within them are not involved in fighting infection. They’re involved in the process whereby the body has healing events producing inflammation, mucus and fever and in the returning of the body to balance afterwards.

The levels and ratios of all immunoglobulins vary considerably all the time and therefore measurements are affected by the timing of the sampling, the sampling occurred only ten days after the first two injections. The study is only observational. It does not compare vaccinated and unvaccinated levels of IgG4 after a detox/healing event mistakenly called ‘breakthrough infections’, only after vaccinations.

The study doesn’t show anything, apart from that injecting yourself with different cocktails of drugs has different effects on the homeostatic system, and is different again if you’ve gone through a healing event. yet makes wild and unsubstantiated conjectures.

The spike protein itself appears to be produced by the cell as part of the stimulation of detoxification. Antibodies that bind to it will be produced in high titre in the convalescent phase to return the body to balance. Thus ‘spike’ specific antibodies may be present whether or not the ‘spike’ protein has been translated by the body from the mRNA injections or were contained in the ‘adenovirus’ cell cultures.

What is p132-230 aka the spike protein?

Injections will also undoubtedly cause damage to the healing system formerly known as the immune system, but not in an ‘AIDS’ like, irreversible damage to ‘clonal selection’ nor ‘immunity’ death sentence kind of way.

However, ‘health freedom’ has fallen for the hype deliberately sent its way.

Philadelphia 2023

Interesting that Arkmedic has tried to link Covid to all the hysteria and fear that surrounds HIV and AIDS. Regarding Kaposi Sarcoma; even CDC scientists accepted that 'HIV' couldn’t cause KS; neither directly nor indirectly. KS largely disappeared at the end of the 80's when the most toxic brands of nitrite inhalants were banned. AIDS was not caused by a virus. It was caused by malnutrition, drug abuse, lack of sleep, overuse of antibiotics, poverty and poor working conditions.

Not a dramatic, lucrative, scary virus.

Belief in an immune deficiency allowing cancers to grow signifies a complete misunderstanding of our homeostatic systems. Our bodies do not ‘fight’ non-existent contagions, bacteria nor cancers; they are attempting to detox and heal from all the shit that we keep putting into them and from the emotions that we are unable to let out of them. Development of ‘cancers’ is part of this process.

The new ‘AIDS’ will be used as a market for expensive, unnecessary, toxic or lethal drugs; just like the old ‘AIDS’ was.

Please stop falling for the hype.

🐒

Ps as predicted VAIDS is coming and ‘immune’ deficiencies to non-existent viruses are allegedly causing cancer and all sorts of shit. From industry shill Jessica Rose; keeping the virus lie alive. Repeated injection, though unwise, cannot generate immune tolerance to something that does not exist.

"IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein"

And on the same day, the vaccine causing ‘covid’ deaths.

covid was not dangerous to the young and healthy until "something happened"

And yet again another in synch propaganda; jumping on the band wagon with a repost. Now viruses are colliding on CD4 cells. It’s a load of crap. There is no link between. ‘HIV’ ‘viral load’ (cell cycles for a non existent virus ) and CD4 count, nor is there correlation with having ‘AIDS’ and abnormal CD4 counts. Now non-existent SARS and non existent VAIDS is impacting on CD4 counts, which could be a target for some drugs for the vaccinated.

REPOST: Repeated Reinfections, VAIDS & The Slow Kill Democide

‘Both HIV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 infection share CD4+ T cell loss in association with disease outcome and immunodeficiency. Direct attacks on CD4+ T cells, immune activation and redistribution of CD4+ T cell are contributing mechanisms in very different proportion for CD4+ T cell lymphopenia in both diseases. […] Overall, experience in HIV clinical management and past clinical trials represent a special use case for innovative studies aiming at increasing CD4+ T cell function and reducing COVID-19 morbidity.’ Total bollocks.

Updated March 2024 as saw this going around; still on the VAIDS gravy train.

Pfizer's COVID Vaccine Causes VAIDS in Children, Study Proves

Lockstep propaganda targeting of ‘alternative’ media to keep the scary virus narrative going.

🐒