So you're LISTING frauds that have been gotten away with for decades despite reporting on them as such, while reporting on frauds in the hope that merely doing so will stop the frauds? great: that's what's needed. More people wishing the problems would just go away while we sit at home & wait for the chickens & cows to lay on our plates after covering themselves with delicious sauces.
What is Your Plan B for when this doesn't work, since this doesn't work? Write louder? Report harder? WHO exactly is it you think will hear & come rescue you? Santa Claus or The Easter Bunny? Kim Jong-un?
Can I get one person to engage in a conversation about what to do when these 'tactics' fail? Because stating that you have always been free doesn't make it so. How is that statement going to stop children dying from the vaccine?
Which is more important to you? Saving lives or pretending that your statements & tactics work? Because if it's the latter, you are no better than anyone ELSE who sacrifices lives for their own egotistical POV to 'look' correct. I can't get anyone else to discuss actual strategies for saving lives because their POVs don't match what needs to be done.
So, I'll apologize here in writing if you HAVE a Plan B. But you gotta admit, reporting on the failings of merely reporting, without discussing other means of stopping the harms sure does seem like an oxymoron, & putting one's POV in front of reality as a priority.
I'm for saving lives. People's egos, not so much. So NO apologies if this hurts ours.
In no particular order, this is all one of many things that only exists due to lobbying, where private corporations pay public officials to vote their agendas into policy.
Since this is the ONLY result that can happen by allowing that, it IS STILL 100% illegal in ALL Western nations.
yes and also share holders of pharma on regulatory bodies and in government, revolving door between pharma and regulation personnel, google etc share holders in pharma...
Right, which brings things back to my initial questions, plus the fact that I have pointed out that we can prove these things in court & they are illegal.
Yes, it would take mass public support behind such an effort to be able to do it safely. Ergo, we need to rally that support, which requires organizing means of acquiring it. Which requires discussion. How much support can connected people get to sign onto something that we can then present to the public as a legitimate attempt to get our freedoms back that they would support.
That or wait for each member of congress to voluntarily & on the same day decide to rejects that $. Which we can STILL DO while doing other things. There's no need to abandon the extremely effective waiting strategy just because one wants to save lives.
Thanks for the recommendation Jo, book arrived today!
Hi Sebastien, enjoy!
So you're LISTING frauds that have been gotten away with for decades despite reporting on them as such, while reporting on frauds in the hope that merely doing so will stop the frauds? great: that's what's needed. More people wishing the problems would just go away while we sit at home & wait for the chickens & cows to lay on our plates after covering themselves with delicious sauces.
What is Your Plan B for when this doesn't work, since this doesn't work? Write louder? Report harder? WHO exactly is it you think will hear & come rescue you? Santa Claus or The Easter Bunny? Kim Jong-un?
Can I get one person to engage in a conversation about what to do when these 'tactics' fail? Because stating that you have always been free doesn't make it so. How is that statement going to stop children dying from the vaccine?
Which is more important to you? Saving lives or pretending that your statements & tactics work? Because if it's the latter, you are no better than anyone ELSE who sacrifices lives for their own egotistical POV to 'look' correct. I can't get anyone else to discuss actual strategies for saving lives because their POVs don't match what needs to be done.
So, I'll apologize here in writing if you HAVE a Plan B. But you gotta admit, reporting on the failings of merely reporting, without discussing other means of stopping the harms sure does seem like an oxymoron, & putting one's POV in front of reality as a priority.
I'm for saving lives. People's egos, not so much. So NO apologies if this hurts ours.
What frauds are you referring to?
In no particular order, this is all one of many things that only exists due to lobbying, where private corporations pay public officials to vote their agendas into policy.
Since this is the ONLY result that can happen by allowing that, it IS STILL 100% illegal in ALL Western nations.
Then there's that the new jabs have 1,291 KNOWN potential harmful effects https://www.brasscheck.com/video/the-news-media-was-literally-paid-off/. Seems we should have laws against mandating people to take products that can harm them. Oh, wait: we do. Again, lobbying.
But with an added bonus; A populace terrified of even thinking negatively about their mere corrupt politicians.
Government officials have admitted IN COURT that covid hasn't even been proven to exist, let alone that none of the lock-down measures can work against it, https://rumble.com/vkorz0-freedom-fighter-court-victory-ends-masking-shots-quarantine-in-alberta.html CERTAINLY not the untested vaccines, 100+ years of trying has resulted in NO virus ever being transferred to any living organism, https://betterness.com/wp-content/uploads/TheInvisibleRainbow.pdf & doctors are being forced out of their jobs & being harassed for speaking the truth about this.
Next question?
yes and also share holders of pharma on regulatory bodies and in government, revolving door between pharma and regulation personnel, google etc share holders in pharma...
Right, which brings things back to my initial questions, plus the fact that I have pointed out that we can prove these things in court & they are illegal.
Yes, it would take mass public support behind such an effort to be able to do it safely. Ergo, we need to rally that support, which requires organizing means of acquiring it. Which requires discussion. How much support can connected people get to sign onto something that we can then present to the public as a legitimate attempt to get our freedoms back that they would support.
That or wait for each member of congress to voluntarily & on the same day decide to rejects that $. Which we can STILL DO while doing other things. There's no need to abandon the extremely effective waiting strategy just because one wants to save lives.
Hello. thank you Cornwall Marc,
and thank you for rummaging.
G and D are cats and very wise.
You'd be very welcome to join us,
Jo
🐒