Come off it, Jo. Have you thought how much carbon is being produced by the US proxy wars in Ukraine, Israel/Iran and shortly the pivot to China?
And you still believe them about "climate change"? When everything they tell us is a lie and a murderous one at that, - covid - the moon landings, 9/11 done by Muslim terrorists? But this one climate scam is true?
Where I live in the UK, land and pigs are an historic right of the indigenous people, who happen to be white. Who were removed from their land from the 15th century onwards and sent to toil in industrial slums. It would be nice to get our land back. There is no "white privilege" about it.
have i thought about it? Of course I have, war contributes to emissions and climate change. but ‘they’ big fossil fuel, arms and animal ag, don’t care- do you not think they’d want to convince you that climate change is a scam?
"Climate change" is a means for a privileged few to control the worlds resources. The last privatisation of the global commons. Carbon trading is an excellent way to monetise natural resources.
While they steal, they need your compliance - it is for your good and to keep the world "safe.".
"Covid19", the 4th Industrial Revolution and Great Reset and Climate change are all massive frauds to create a series of monopolies, cartels and oligopolies that govern food, energy, healthcare and the most basic parts of our lives. The plan is for a new phase of global capitalism- enabled by national states and governments, international organisations and quangos (EU, UN, NATO, IMF, WTO, WHO, Gates, GAVI)- with no clear lines between state and non-state actors.
In fact this class war is an extreme ideological war to re-engineer society, its attitudes, its values and all human bonds.
What the purveyors of the WEF/4IR etc. are peddling is a radical ideological revolution, a brutal socioeconomic reset.
The deliberate discontinuity of about 200 years of social development is what we are witnessing today- a war waged by elites who desire a return back to neo-feudalism and who wish to impose a form of slavery within their dystopian technocratic society.
The purpose of such a society is not like in the past, simply limited to labour contribution to the plantation system and its profits, but setting up people to become 24/7 social machines devoid of any other purpose or end but to fulfill the ad hoc systemic needs of the society of technocratic control.
In fact such new ideological transformation forms the central front of The Global Reset offensive under the guise of an imminent threat of some deadly medical calamity (COVID) or some global disaster (war on carbon aka global warming).
Together, these organizations in lockstep with governments and Intel agencies form a powerful, interconnected network that shapes global environmental policies, at the expense of true public health and national sovereignty, while facilitating massive wealth transfers and consolidation of power among global elites. Their role in the Climate change operation demonstrates their capacity to coordinate on a global scale to implement sweeping changes in society, economics, and governance.
Their power and control allows them to pull the strings of governance and finance at the international, national, regional, state and local levels
It is thought that reduction of the gut is a function of the higher-quality, easier to digest (i.e., less fibrous) diet of humans relative to other apes, and that an evolutionary trend for gut reduction began when early members of the genus Homo began to incorporate a greater amount of animal tissues (marrow fat, brain matter, and muscle) about 2.5 million years ago. Since gut tissue is metabolically expensive, the reduction of the gut may have allowed early members of our genus to devote greater metabolic energy to brain growth and maintenance, thus relaxing a constraint on the evolutionary increase in brain size ( an idea known as the "expensive tissue hypothesis": Aiello & Wheeler, 1995). It has also been suggested that cooking, which breaks down plants fibre (cellulose and lignin) and connective tissue in meat (collagen) allowed early humans to extract more nutrients from foodstuff with less digestive effort, thus also contributing to an evolutionary reduction in (shortening of) energetically expensive gut tissue.
The relative size of the small intestine, even longer than in herbivores, does not indicate that humans became carnivores. Carnivores have larger stomachs and ten times the amount of acid than humans have, to digest raw meat. It is not known when modern humans diverged from great ape relatives in the change in small to large intestine ratio. It may have occurred with the beginning of cooking, which effectively starts the digestion process. Modern humans still ate mostly plants but were not chowing down on bamboo, but eating nutrient dense foods such as nuts and cooked beans, starchy vegetables and tubers. Less time digesting, more time for thinking. Their large intestines were still long enough (only shorter relative to their small intestines) to be adapted for eating lots of leafy fibre, protected by fibre-loving bacteria but also able to absorb cholesterol and toxic bile acids.
Also, we are the only animal with an "external stomach" in that we must cook our food. You would only live for about six months on an entirely raw diet. We cannot extract enough nutrients from our food without cooking. We are essentially a technological animal - we cannot survive without cooking.
This is absolutely spot in and brilliant Jo. You've covered everything in this article.
Vegan for everything ❤️
Thank you Jacquie 🙏🏼- I always seem to expect negative comments- this is so lovely xxx
Come off it, Jo. Have you thought how much carbon is being produced by the US proxy wars in Ukraine, Israel/Iran and shortly the pivot to China?
And you still believe them about "climate change"? When everything they tell us is a lie and a murderous one at that, - covid - the moon landings, 9/11 done by Muslim terrorists? But this one climate scam is true?
Where I live in the UK, land and pigs are an historic right of the indigenous people, who happen to be white. Who were removed from their land from the 15th century onwards and sent to toil in industrial slums. It would be nice to get our land back. There is no "white privilege" about it.
have i thought about it? Of course I have, war contributes to emissions and climate change. but ‘they’ big fossil fuel, arms and animal ag, don’t care- do you not think they’d want to convince you that climate change is a scam?
"Climate change" is a means for a privileged few to control the worlds resources. The last privatisation of the global commons. Carbon trading is an excellent way to monetise natural resources.
While they steal, they need your compliance - it is for your good and to keep the world "safe.".
Twit.
"Covid19", the 4th Industrial Revolution and Great Reset and Climate change are all massive frauds to create a series of monopolies, cartels and oligopolies that govern food, energy, healthcare and the most basic parts of our lives. The plan is for a new phase of global capitalism- enabled by national states and governments, international organisations and quangos (EU, UN, NATO, IMF, WTO, WHO, Gates, GAVI)- with no clear lines between state and non-state actors.
In fact this class war is an extreme ideological war to re-engineer society, its attitudes, its values and all human bonds.
What the purveyors of the WEF/4IR etc. are peddling is a radical ideological revolution, a brutal socioeconomic reset.
The deliberate discontinuity of about 200 years of social development is what we are witnessing today- a war waged by elites who desire a return back to neo-feudalism and who wish to impose a form of slavery within their dystopian technocratic society.
The purpose of such a society is not like in the past, simply limited to labour contribution to the plantation system and its profits, but setting up people to become 24/7 social machines devoid of any other purpose or end but to fulfill the ad hoc systemic needs of the society of technocratic control.
In fact such new ideological transformation forms the central front of The Global Reset offensive under the guise of an imminent threat of some deadly medical calamity (COVID) or some global disaster (war on carbon aka global warming).
So bored with this shite.
Together, these organizations in lockstep with governments and Intel agencies form a powerful, interconnected network that shapes global environmental policies, at the expense of true public health and national sovereignty, while facilitating massive wealth transfers and consolidation of power among global elites. Their role in the Climate change operation demonstrates their capacity to coordinate on a global scale to implement sweeping changes in society, economics, and governance.
Their power and control allows them to pull the strings of governance and finance at the international, national, regional, state and local levels
Human guts are adapted to an omnivorous and carnivore diet, unlike other apes.
https://carta.anthropogeny.org/moca/topics/smalllarge-intestine-length-ratio
It is thought that reduction of the gut is a function of the higher-quality, easier to digest (i.e., less fibrous) diet of humans relative to other apes, and that an evolutionary trend for gut reduction began when early members of the genus Homo began to incorporate a greater amount of animal tissues (marrow fat, brain matter, and muscle) about 2.5 million years ago. Since gut tissue is metabolically expensive, the reduction of the gut may have allowed early members of our genus to devote greater metabolic energy to brain growth and maintenance, thus relaxing a constraint on the evolutionary increase in brain size ( an idea known as the "expensive tissue hypothesis": Aiello & Wheeler, 1995). It has also been suggested that cooking, which breaks down plants fibre (cellulose and lignin) and connective tissue in meat (collagen) allowed early humans to extract more nutrients from foodstuff with less digestive effort, thus also contributing to an evolutionary reduction in (shortening of) energetically expensive gut tissue.
The relative size of the small intestine, even longer than in herbivores, does not indicate that humans became carnivores. Carnivores have larger stomachs and ten times the amount of acid than humans have, to digest raw meat. It is not known when modern humans diverged from great ape relatives in the change in small to large intestine ratio. It may have occurred with the beginning of cooking, which effectively starts the digestion process. Modern humans still ate mostly plants but were not chowing down on bamboo, but eating nutrient dense foods such as nuts and cooked beans, starchy vegetables and tubers. Less time digesting, more time for thinking. Their large intestines were still long enough (only shorter relative to their small intestines) to be adapted for eating lots of leafy fibre, protected by fibre-loving bacteria but also able to absorb cholesterol and toxic bile acids.
This is absolutely not true. Our intestines are evolved for fruit. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/are-humans-more-like-chimps-or-wolves?utm_source=publication-search
Also, we are the only animal with an "external stomach" in that we must cook our food. You would only live for about six months on an entirely raw diet. We cannot extract enough nutrients from our food without cooking. We are essentially a technological animal - we cannot survive without cooking.
A fool, a stupid insensitive fool.