People do not want to challenge. They like the steady state, the comfort of old familiar pills, ‘vaccines’ and interventions by a medical junta that have forgotten the Hippocratic oath.
It is too hard for many to change direction and look the other way, the good news is that there are enough people that are willing which will become the paradigm shift humanity needs.
I fall in the I don’t know if viruses exist but I’m open to all arguments because of the data showing vaccines do not work like “they” say. So what else is not true. 🤷♀️
yes someone linked me to it. Here is the actual document which I think is really well put together https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/settling-the-virus-debate-and-uniting Despite would SK says there is plenty of money available for labs who want to take part. And why wouldn't they, it's kinda important to know one way or the other?
Mike Yeadon in his comments says 'Steve, I no longer believe that what we call covid19 is caused by a novel respiratory virus.'
There is definitely something in the air. Many, like you, question the mRNA vaccines not working, questioning other vaccines (have you read Dissolving Illusions by Humphries and Bystrianyk?), which naturally leads them to question causes of disease.
I heartily recommend Virus Mania by Engelbrecht and Köhnlein
I haven’t read any of those books but they are on my wish list. I have several friends that have been anti all jabs for many years. I slowly began to see things myself (flu, then HPV, now Covid). All the research led me to Sam Bailey and others. It’s just all so curious. The witch-hunts against dissenting scientists that have occurred since Galileo have led me to understand that it is very possible we have it all wrong!
Hiya, Yes I think we are all coming from the same place of trust in what we have been taught to incremental realisations that a lot of it is very wrong. I used to work in pathology and never questioned but when I was reading the chapter on AIDS in Virus Mania last year the whole edifice in my mind of it being caused by a virus just crumbled.
Now I'm still coming to terms with the fact that Arthur Ashe, Freddie Mercury, Rock Hudson and many others have been murdered by AZT.
I'm looking into chemotherapy for cancer at the moment, and there doesn't seem to be much evidence that it actually helps anyone either.
I used to believe that some vaccines worked. Then I grew up.
I mean that a lot of adults like to preserve their thought in the comfort of highschool truths. When one is tired of that particular form of madness, one must move to a different kind of madness.
They told us that a person who survives a viral infection gains immunity, and a vaccine replicates that process without making people ill. So, it is a form of cheating. We like lifelong protection, we dislike disease, we can have both by cheating using vaccines. But Nature doesn't like cheating, as we have verified too many times.
I don't know when this myth will fall apart. I laugh thinking in the next hobgoblin the Powerful will invent to enslave the mind of the people.
Far far too many things, including your question, remind me of the joke that only those ignorant of physics laugh at ( Why don't they build the whole air plane out of what they make the black box out of? § would be too heavy & increase the cost in fuel, which self stacks on the fuel needed to carry that extra fuel, resulting in inability to fly reliably or feasible due to cost. ) Those who understand basic physics don't "get" the joke, but they have no warning and maybe willing to remedy their ignorance... you on the other hand have me concerned that you are asking me a question thinking, due to a lack of understanding of cause & effect ( and from reading more of your posts since, a clear struggle with linear time.)
First, before going further, to answer your question, every challenge to assumptions that you presented was fiction. As for your recommended reading: I have read, discussed, and laughed at the idiocy from that book in a support group almost a decade ago iirc. (overall it was more laughter than anything else) My main take away was how the book read like a madlib for all the claimed "shifts" away from empirical/post-fact positions. For example, no different than an Abrahamic religion apologist who claims they used to be an atheist -- but vaccines instead of god(s). Just have to swap the right buzz words that make the audience's develop a false feeling of enlightenment & part of the idea's in crowd. Add a dash of persecution complex by misrepresenting rational challenges as fear of the truth, haters, or teaching them to project the audience's indoctrination. With the likes of you going above and beyond not just willingly abandoning reason & your ability require evidence to support the claims that has consensus by those who are expert in their fields, you have let them strip your belief that those experts even exist, and gone on to sell their (and many other) snake oils.
Very simple to show your, for lack of better phrasing, learned helplessness by just looking at what you think was enough of a reply that you, who have accepted without genuine evaluation, "the decline in all diseases vaccines are made for before their introduction." That could never make any sense as a correlation/causation relationship as you have to have an understanding about the symptoms of a disease and its causes/sources to develop a vaccine where as that happens it brings better health practices. ( also worse, when bad science and things eVeRyOnEkNoWs lead to poor results )
Great recent example of this is masks with covid-19. Assumptions were made that it would behave the same as ~2003 sars, so you can see trends in countries where masks were a normality, like in Asia, vs those who were adapting to this change in personal behavior (or having a major political party demonize and make masks a culture war issue). In fact you can see the QOP/MAGAts as almost a control to compare those who masked from the start, the impact masking had as it was accepted, then where masks needed policy to get used vs those who used out of respect for their fellow man, THEN add the vaccine and watch that mask data rates continue as the needed quality of masks was better understood.
My advice, if you can't stop devouring the sacred books/content of this pseudo-cult, then get a microscope. (Get a fun one, my children and I use one that can also function as a projector on a wall! All kinds of fun when going on day trips or camping) Then look at all the things you have been told do not exist. Order them or follow guides to get samples; hell, crowd fund for it if needed.
Reality is quite a bit more fun. Save the fiction for consumption instead of producing on blogs something that others will take seriously and with that they may die. And their deaths, like it or not, are on you.
which bit of it is fiction. the decline in all diseases vaccines are made for before their introduction? I recommend Dissolving Illusions by Humpries and Bystraniank, fully referenced.
((( Sorry for double posting, new to substack comment/reply system, thought I was typing in the reply box, leaving both up as I don't know how delete works here and don't want to leave empty bit about. )))
Far far too many things, including your question, remind me of the joke that only those ignorant of physics laugh at ( Why don't they build the whole air plane out of what they make the black box out of? § would be too heavy & increase the cost in fuel, which self stacks on the fuel needed to carry that extra fuel, resulting in inability to fly reliably or feasible due to cost. ) Those who understand basic physics don't "get" the joke, but they have no warning and maybe willing to remedy their ignorance... you on the other hand have me concerned that you are asking me a question thinking, due to a lack of understanding of cause & effect ( and from reading more of your posts since, a clear struggle with linear time.)
First, before going further, to answer your question, every challenge to assumptions that you presented was fiction. As for your recommended reading: I have read, discussed, and laughed at the idiocy from that book in a support group almost a decade ago iirc. (overall it was more laughter than anything else) My main take away was how the book read like a madlib for all the claimed "shifts" away from empirical/post-fact positions. For example, no different than an Abrahamic religion apologist who claims they used to be an atheist -- but vaccines instead of god(s). Just have to swap the right buzz words that make the audience's develop a false feeling of enlightenment & part of the idea's in crowd. Add a dash of persecution complex by misrepresenting rational challenges as fear of the truth, haters, or teaching them to project the audience's indoctrination. With the likes of you going above and beyond not just willingly abandoning reason & your ability require evidence to support the claims that has consensus by those who are expert in their fields, you have let them strip your belief that those experts even exist, and gone on to sell their (and many other) snake oils.
Very simple to show your, for lack of better phrasing, learned helplessness by just looking at what you think was enough of a reply that you, who have accepted without genuine evaluation, "the decline in all diseases vaccines are made for before their introduction." That could never make any sense as a correlation/causation relationship as you have to have an understanding about the symptoms of a disease and its causes/sources to develop a vaccine where as that happens it brings better health practices. ( also worse, when bad science and things eVeRyOnEkNoWs lead to poor results )
Great recent example of this is masks with covid-19. Assumptions were made that it would behave the same as ~2003 sars, so you can see trends in countries where masks were a normality, like in Asia, vs those who were adapting to this change in personal behavior (or having a major political party demonize and make masks a culture war issue). In fact you can see the QOP/MAGAts as almost a control to compare those who masked from the start, the impact masking had as it was accepted, then where masks needed policy to get used vs those who used out of respect for their fellow man, THEN add the vaccine and watch that mask data rates continue as the needed quality of masks was better understood.
My advice, if you can't stop devouring the sacred books/content of this pseudo-cult, then get a microscope. (Get a fun one, my children and I use one that can also function as a projector on a wall! All kinds of fun when going on day trips or camping) Then look at all the things you have been told do not exist. Order them or follow guides to get samples; hell, crowd fund for it if needed.
Reality is quite a bit more fun. Save the fiction for consumption instead of producing on blogs something that others will take seriously and with that they may die. And their deaths, like it or not, are on you.
Indeed, there is no evidence for the existence of pathogenic, transmissible, infectious particles with the spike shaped proteins, 3d structures and genomes that they say they have.
Please say something about the photo at the beginning of the piece because it is not clear what message it is intended to convey or from where it comes, etc
It's all in the first post within the post https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/lets-hope-the-monkey-pox-nonsense 'I expect we all have seen this when googling smallpox. Google is heavily invested in vaccine technology after all. It reminds me of the pictures we have seen of Covid patients. Are we really seeing what they say we are?
We are told that these 2 boys were infected on the same day, from the same source and we can assume that the method of infection was similar to the vaccination method. The vaccination procedure, until 1895, involved taking the scabs or ‘pox pustular lymph’ fluid (that is the toxins, decaying and dead cells being expelled from the body) from the pustules of one or more sick patients, and rubbing it into cuts made on the arms of a healthy person. Not surprisingly pox formation and death often resulted from this procedure.
‘Fresh vesicles subsequently formed around the vaccination pocks coalescing with them and causing them to spread. They developed also on the face, body, and in the mouth, the later prevented the child from suckling, and it died exhausted on the 45th day after vaccination.’ Case of a healthy child after vaccination March 13th, 1891
We cannot know if each boy above had the same amount of pus or whether one had a greater number of cuts made into his arm. If the first cut did not ‘take’-a subjective assessment of the amount inflammation- more cuts and rubbing of pus was often done.
Let’s remember that these poor boys were deliberately infected in the name of science. There were, obviously, no ethical considerations- testing was done on orphans, Catholics and the Irish. Do we therefore trust the integrity of these experimenters to treat both boys in exactly the same way, with the same number of cuts, and the same dilution of toxic pus? From our knowledge of modern pharmaceutical company’s adherence to protocol, when there is a large financial motivation- I would say not.
Both these boys have pox and their appearance does look like a dose-dependent response to a toxin. Whatever the case, in this ‘experiment’ there is only one person in each group, (and there may be many reasons why one boy is less susceptible to a toxin that another), and not a randomised, blinded, placebo controlled trial. It is therefore meaningless scientifically, though admittedly it is very powerful propaganda.
There is an irony in using one of the earliest, maybe even the first, example of events that yield an antivaxx movement that spread rumors that the cow pox that was being used to inoculate (and later develop the vaccine) would cause horns to grow eventually turning you into a cow. These days the just redefine terms that they can retrofit to their message and deny the existence of everything else.
The overall theme of virtue signaling is obvious with the focus on scientific value and the moral dubious nature of just these tests, as though the methods for scientific practices grew to have challenge studies which would later evolve into peer review double blind studies. And you are mistaken about that small dataset, while it is not reliable to extrapolate data from or reach any confident conclusions, they tested hypothesis and the limitations of results lead to better future tests. Far from meaningless. Also never seen the pic of the boys without the limitations of what was learned along side it... well before now.
p53 mutation with frequent novel condons but not a mutator phenotype in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast tumours
T Crook 1 , L A Brooks, S Crossland, P Osin, K T Barker, J Waller, E Philp, P D Smith, I Yulug, J Peto, G Parker, M J Allday, M R Crompton, B A Gusterson
Smooth muscle actin and vimentin as markers of testis development in the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena)
W V Holt 1 , J Waller, A Moore, P D Jepson, R Deaville, P M Bennett
I'm finding it hard to reconcile this view of yours, which I agree with, with your other post about staining of antibodies. And also your support of trolls and your tendency to respond with sarc.
Mike Stone for example on that post had a good response but your response didn't seem to address his questions or challenges to my mind.
People do not want to challenge. They like the steady state, the comfort of old familiar pills, ‘vaccines’ and interventions by a medical junta that have forgotten the Hippocratic oath.
It is too hard for many to change direction and look the other way, the good news is that there are enough people that are willing which will become the paradigm shift humanity needs.
Did you see this on Steve Kirsch’s substack? https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/settling-the-virus-debate-challenge?r=qx44m&utm_medium=ios
I fall in the I don’t know if viruses exist but I’m open to all arguments because of the data showing vaccines do not work like “they” say. So what else is not true. 🤷♀️
Hey there The Cogg Mom,
yes someone linked me to it. Here is the actual document which I think is really well put together https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/settling-the-virus-debate-and-uniting Despite would SK says there is plenty of money available for labs who want to take part. And why wouldn't they, it's kinda important to know one way or the other?
Mike Yeadon in his comments says 'Steve, I no longer believe that what we call covid19 is caused by a novel respiratory virus.'
Though I really don't care anymore whether prominent people do or don't think viruses exist. I've looked at the evidence for myself. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing
There is definitely something in the air. Many, like you, question the mRNA vaccines not working, questioning other vaccines (have you read Dissolving Illusions by Humphries and Bystrianyk?), which naturally leads them to question causes of disease.
I heartily recommend Virus Mania by Engelbrecht and Köhnlein
You will see a lot of what 'they' say is not true
Jo
I haven’t read any of those books but they are on my wish list. I have several friends that have been anti all jabs for many years. I slowly began to see things myself (flu, then HPV, now Covid). All the research led me to Sam Bailey and others. It’s just all so curious. The witch-hunts against dissenting scientists that have occurred since Galileo have led me to understand that it is very possible we have it all wrong!
Hiya, Yes I think we are all coming from the same place of trust in what we have been taught to incremental realisations that a lot of it is very wrong. I used to work in pathology and never questioned but when I was reading the chapter on AIDS in Virus Mania last year the whole edifice in my mind of it being caused by a virus just crumbled.
Now I'm still coming to terms with the fact that Arthur Ashe, Freddie Mercury, Rock Hudson and many others have been murdered by AZT.
I'm looking into chemotherapy for cancer at the moment, and there doesn't seem to be much evidence that it actually helps anyone either.
Always learning, always curious
Jo🌸
Thanks by the way. 😊
You are very welcome 🙏🏽
Hiya,
If you're interested in following this soap opera https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/the-real-reason-i-now-refuse-to-debate Christine Massey replies to millionaire invested in early treatment drugs Steve Kirsch's comments!
Jo
I used to believe that some vaccines worked. Then I grew up.
I mean that a lot of adults like to preserve their thought in the comfort of highschool truths. When one is tired of that particular form of madness, one must move to a different kind of madness.
They told us that a person who survives a viral infection gains immunity, and a vaccine replicates that process without making people ill. So, it is a form of cheating. We like lifelong protection, we dislike disease, we can have both by cheating using vaccines. But Nature doesn't like cheating, as we have verified too many times.
I don't know when this myth will fall apart. I laugh thinking in the next hobgoblin the Powerful will invent to enslave the mind of the people.
Far far too many things, including your question, remind me of the joke that only those ignorant of physics laugh at ( Why don't they build the whole air plane out of what they make the black box out of? § would be too heavy & increase the cost in fuel, which self stacks on the fuel needed to carry that extra fuel, resulting in inability to fly reliably or feasible due to cost. ) Those who understand basic physics don't "get" the joke, but they have no warning and maybe willing to remedy their ignorance... you on the other hand have me concerned that you are asking me a question thinking, due to a lack of understanding of cause & effect ( and from reading more of your posts since, a clear struggle with linear time.)
First, before going further, to answer your question, every challenge to assumptions that you presented was fiction. As for your recommended reading: I have read, discussed, and laughed at the idiocy from that book in a support group almost a decade ago iirc. (overall it was more laughter than anything else) My main take away was how the book read like a madlib for all the claimed "shifts" away from empirical/post-fact positions. For example, no different than an Abrahamic religion apologist who claims they used to be an atheist -- but vaccines instead of god(s). Just have to swap the right buzz words that make the audience's develop a false feeling of enlightenment & part of the idea's in crowd. Add a dash of persecution complex by misrepresenting rational challenges as fear of the truth, haters, or teaching them to project the audience's indoctrination. With the likes of you going above and beyond not just willingly abandoning reason & your ability require evidence to support the claims that has consensus by those who are expert in their fields, you have let them strip your belief that those experts even exist, and gone on to sell their (and many other) snake oils.
Very simple to show your, for lack of better phrasing, learned helplessness by just looking at what you think was enough of a reply that you, who have accepted without genuine evaluation, "the decline in all diseases vaccines are made for before their introduction." That could never make any sense as a correlation/causation relationship as you have to have an understanding about the symptoms of a disease and its causes/sources to develop a vaccine where as that happens it brings better health practices. ( also worse, when bad science and things eVeRyOnEkNoWs lead to poor results )
Great recent example of this is masks with covid-19. Assumptions were made that it would behave the same as ~2003 sars, so you can see trends in countries where masks were a normality, like in Asia, vs those who were adapting to this change in personal behavior (or having a major political party demonize and make masks a culture war issue). In fact you can see the QOP/MAGAts as almost a control to compare those who masked from the start, the impact masking had as it was accepted, then where masks needed policy to get used vs those who used out of respect for their fellow man, THEN add the vaccine and watch that mask data rates continue as the needed quality of masks was better understood.
My advice, if you can't stop devouring the sacred books/content of this pseudo-cult, then get a microscope. (Get a fun one, my children and I use one that can also function as a projector on a wall! All kinds of fun when going on day trips or camping) Then look at all the things you have been told do not exist. Order them or follow guides to get samples; hell, crowd fund for it if needed.
Reality is quite a bit more fun. Save the fiction for consumption instead of producing on blogs something that others will take seriously and with that they may die. And their deaths, like it or not, are on you.
Has jealousy for the attention flerfs (flat earthers) have gotten for their antics driven you to write this incredibly silly bit of anti-vaxx fiction?
which bit of it is fiction. the decline in all diseases vaccines are made for before their introduction? I recommend Dissolving Illusions by Humpries and Bystraniank, fully referenced.
((( Sorry for double posting, new to substack comment/reply system, thought I was typing in the reply box, leaving both up as I don't know how delete works here and don't want to leave empty bit about. )))
Far far too many things, including your question, remind me of the joke that only those ignorant of physics laugh at ( Why don't they build the whole air plane out of what they make the black box out of? § would be too heavy & increase the cost in fuel, which self stacks on the fuel needed to carry that extra fuel, resulting in inability to fly reliably or feasible due to cost. ) Those who understand basic physics don't "get" the joke, but they have no warning and maybe willing to remedy their ignorance... you on the other hand have me concerned that you are asking me a question thinking, due to a lack of understanding of cause & effect ( and from reading more of your posts since, a clear struggle with linear time.)
First, before going further, to answer your question, every challenge to assumptions that you presented was fiction. As for your recommended reading: I have read, discussed, and laughed at the idiocy from that book in a support group almost a decade ago iirc. (overall it was more laughter than anything else) My main take away was how the book read like a madlib for all the claimed "shifts" away from empirical/post-fact positions. For example, no different than an Abrahamic religion apologist who claims they used to be an atheist -- but vaccines instead of god(s). Just have to swap the right buzz words that make the audience's develop a false feeling of enlightenment & part of the idea's in crowd. Add a dash of persecution complex by misrepresenting rational challenges as fear of the truth, haters, or teaching them to project the audience's indoctrination. With the likes of you going above and beyond not just willingly abandoning reason & your ability require evidence to support the claims that has consensus by those who are expert in their fields, you have let them strip your belief that those experts even exist, and gone on to sell their (and many other) snake oils.
Very simple to show your, for lack of better phrasing, learned helplessness by just looking at what you think was enough of a reply that you, who have accepted without genuine evaluation, "the decline in all diseases vaccines are made for before their introduction." That could never make any sense as a correlation/causation relationship as you have to have an understanding about the symptoms of a disease and its causes/sources to develop a vaccine where as that happens it brings better health practices. ( also worse, when bad science and things eVeRyOnEkNoWs lead to poor results )
Great recent example of this is masks with covid-19. Assumptions were made that it would behave the same as ~2003 sars, so you can see trends in countries where masks were a normality, like in Asia, vs those who were adapting to this change in personal behavior (or having a major political party demonize and make masks a culture war issue). In fact you can see the QOP/MAGAts as almost a control to compare those who masked from the start, the impact masking had as it was accepted, then where masks needed policy to get used vs those who used out of respect for their fellow man, THEN add the vaccine and watch that mask data rates continue as the needed quality of masks was better understood.
My advice, if you can't stop devouring the sacred books/content of this pseudo-cult, then get a microscope. (Get a fun one, my children and I use one that can also function as a projector on a wall! All kinds of fun when going on day trips or camping) Then look at all the things you have been told do not exist. Order them or follow guides to get samples; hell, crowd fund for it if needed.
Reality is quite a bit more fun. Save the fiction for consumption instead of producing on blogs something that others will take seriously and with that they may die. And their deaths, like it or not, are on you.
So, the viruses don't exist?
Indeed, there is no evidence for the existence of pathogenic, transmissible, infectious particles with the spike shaped proteins, 3d structures and genomes that they say they have.
So what's your view on 'green passes' Jo?
Please say something about the photo at the beginning of the piece because it is not clear what message it is intended to convey or from where it comes, etc
It's all in the first post within the post https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/lets-hope-the-monkey-pox-nonsense 'I expect we all have seen this when googling smallpox. Google is heavily invested in vaccine technology after all. It reminds me of the pictures we have seen of Covid patients. Are we really seeing what they say we are?
We are told that these 2 boys were infected on the same day, from the same source and we can assume that the method of infection was similar to the vaccination method. The vaccination procedure, until 1895, involved taking the scabs or ‘pox pustular lymph’ fluid (that is the toxins, decaying and dead cells being expelled from the body) from the pustules of one or more sick patients, and rubbing it into cuts made on the arms of a healthy person. Not surprisingly pox formation and death often resulted from this procedure.
‘Fresh vesicles subsequently formed around the vaccination pocks coalescing with them and causing them to spread. They developed also on the face, body, and in the mouth, the later prevented the child from suckling, and it died exhausted on the 45th day after vaccination.’ Case of a healthy child after vaccination March 13th, 1891
We cannot know if each boy above had the same amount of pus or whether one had a greater number of cuts made into his arm. If the first cut did not ‘take’-a subjective assessment of the amount inflammation- more cuts and rubbing of pus was often done.
Let’s remember that these poor boys were deliberately infected in the name of science. There were, obviously, no ethical considerations- testing was done on orphans, Catholics and the Irish. Do we therefore trust the integrity of these experimenters to treat both boys in exactly the same way, with the same number of cuts, and the same dilution of toxic pus? From our knowledge of modern pharmaceutical company’s adherence to protocol, when there is a large financial motivation- I would say not.
Both these boys have pox and their appearance does look like a dose-dependent response to a toxin. Whatever the case, in this ‘experiment’ there is only one person in each group, (and there may be many reasons why one boy is less susceptible to a toxin that another), and not a randomised, blinded, placebo controlled trial. It is therefore meaningless scientifically, though admittedly it is very powerful propaganda.
Thanks for reading
Jo
There is an irony in using one of the earliest, maybe even the first, example of events that yield an antivaxx movement that spread rumors that the cow pox that was being used to inoculate (and later develop the vaccine) would cause horns to grow eventually turning you into a cow. These days the just redefine terms that they can retrofit to their message and deny the existence of everything else.
The overall theme of virtue signaling is obvious with the focus on scientific value and the moral dubious nature of just these tests, as though the methods for scientific practices grew to have challenge studies which would later evolve into peer review double blind studies. And you are mistaken about that small dataset, while it is not reliable to extrapolate data from or reach any confident conclusions, they tested hypothesis and the limitations of results lead to better future tests. Far from meaningless. Also never seen the pic of the boys without the limitations of what was learned along side it... well before now.
where can i find the published scientific pieces from your hand?
Hiya,
each post is referenced at the bottom. Dissolving Illusions itself is well referenced.
Jo
that is not what i asked for.
what have you written that is published?
Oh I see
Identification of parietal cells in gastric body mucosa with HMFG-2 monoclonal antibody.
Walker MM, Smolka A, Waller JM, Evans DJ.
J Clin Pathol. 1995 Sep;48(9):832-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.9.832.
PMID: 7490316 Free PMC article.
Parietal cells in the duodenal bulb and their relation to Helicobacter pylori infection.
Harris AW, Walker MM, Smolka A, Waller JM, Baron JH, Misiewicz JJ.
J Clin Pathol. 1996 Apr;49(4):309-12. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.4.309.
PMID: 8655707 Free PMC
p53 mutation with frequent novel condons but not a mutator phenotype in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast tumours
T Crook 1 , L A Brooks, S Crossland, P Osin, K T Barker, J Waller, E Philp, P D Smith, I Yulug, J Peto, G Parker, M J Allday, M R Crompton, B A Gusterson
Smooth muscle actin and vimentin as markers of testis development in the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena)
W V Holt 1 , J Waller, A Moore, P D Jepson, R Deaville, P M Bennett
Affiliations expand
PMID: 15379925 PMCID: PMC1571340 DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00328.x
Jo
strange, there is no single name that is mentioned as co author in all 4 publications.
i wonder what that means..
...it means you're not a good detective, 2 of them have a middle initial and 2 of them don't
so you claim to be both of them at the same time?
I'm finding it hard to reconcile this view of yours, which I agree with, with your other post about staining of antibodies. And also your support of trolls and your tendency to respond with sarc.
Mike Stone for example on that post had a good response but your response didn't seem to address his questions or challenges to my mind.
What’s wrong with trolling and sarcasm, Substack would get painfully tedious without them.
Depends where used I guess. Mike Stone's response deserved better.
As for the support of trolls, also depends which one.
I answered by accepting some comments and editing my post.
Who is "I".
It doesn't seem to be Jo Waller.
thank you
Were the comments removed by substack or Bossche?
Jo
oh I see. A bit worrying
Why?
As I said elsewhere I prefer drama to soap opera.
All you've done is try and distract from that, while getting likes from one of the subversives that you speak of.
Cheers Frank.
Uh huh.
You know what your problem is? Well ok, changed my mind. I'm not going to say.