Anything pasteur methodology adds more toxicity, based on BS.
Sometimes you might have something potentially beneficial, but which is then, thanks to pasteur methodology specifically tainted to not have benefit outweighing the damage, by definition of the methodology.
An example would be a poppy plant, quite useful if you're not a pharma moron. Otoh, you can get far less complex, mostly meaningless derivatives that are far worse, thanks to pharma.
For instance, a lot of people would be under the impression that opium poppies are bad (they're not necessarily), but have full faith in crap orders of magnitude more toxic, useless, overpriced...coz of? Oh that's right, "freemason" institutions.
I remember reading that the guy who"discovered" endorphins (postulated, actually) did so because he "discovered" receptors specific to opium in bodies. He then concluded that it was not possible for body to have receptors to a plant so he concluded that there must be pain relievers in the body. But if one looks at the earth and the universe as an integrated whole, than it is not surprising that body would have a receptor to a plant substance.
So, basically, it suppressed the detox process of a few folk, and killed a few folk more. Winning!(?)
I don't believe it even suppressed detox symptoms, I have no confidence in their results.
You know what I'd say.
Anything pasteur methodology adds more toxicity, based on BS.
Sometimes you might have something potentially beneficial, but which is then, thanks to pasteur methodology specifically tainted to not have benefit outweighing the damage, by definition of the methodology.
An example would be a poppy plant, quite useful if you're not a pharma moron. Otoh, you can get far less complex, mostly meaningless derivatives that are far worse, thanks to pharma.
For instance, a lot of people would be under the impression that opium poppies are bad (they're not necessarily), but have full faith in crap orders of magnitude more toxic, useless, overpriced...coz of? Oh that's right, "freemason" institutions.
I remember reading that the guy who"discovered" endorphins (postulated, actually) did so because he "discovered" receptors specific to opium in bodies. He then concluded that it was not possible for body to have receptors to a plant so he concluded that there must be pain relievers in the body. But if one looks at the earth and the universe as an integrated whole, than it is not surprising that body would have a receptor to a plant substance.
Indeed, and I would agree with you. ItтАЩs been a moment, sir.