The very observation that folks who are frail and deficient in vitamins, esp. D, get sick more often, points to Terrain. Whatever 'triggers' the sickness they are calling 'the virus'. So it would seem that few people outright deny terrain, and are admitting it is at least partially causal in sickness. That is really the crack in the door, once you admit the bodies health level is a primary factor, the presence of 'pathogen' becomes quite secondary and not worth chasing anyway. If a seed of grass can wait 100 years for the right conditions to sprout, pathogens can wait around in the body for the right conditions as well. You kill people trying to make them virus free, it's impossible and ill defined but a great way to depopulate a planet.
So I have to ask; given the germ theory folks are as obstinate and (apparently) unwilling to put their theories to a comprehensive test, as in all such cases, cui bono; who benefits from the continued existence of germ theory? And wouldn't proponents do almost anything to shut down any legitimate critique of the theory?
Great Post. I may grant Igor "Amnesty". So far he has not called for the killing of millions like the solid pro-vaccine crowd do. But I still hope he does not cross the line like Steve K. and Alex B. and chat endlessly about "variants" and Antibody yzq etc.
I have never heard the word praxis before, very fancy, so I learnt something. Come now there must be lots of Americans who like reading, admittedly very dull, papers on molecular biology!
I think it unfortunately got lodged in my head from listening to the Progressive left wax on for years about how to take over the Democratic party or leave it. So I half hate it as it often gets used by people in a pretentious way but half like it because it cuts through the noise and asks what are the practical steps to be taken.
I find it fascinating to read different perspectives. It's so easy to get swept along and accept the basics of a situation because the discussion is "further along" the path, i.e., lockdowns, masking, sanitizing, etc. Let's see where this all goes.
The very observation that folks who are frail and deficient in vitamins, esp. D, get sick more often, points to Terrain. Whatever 'triggers' the sickness they are calling 'the virus'. So it would seem that few people outright deny terrain, and are admitting it is at least partially causal in sickness. That is really the crack in the door, once you admit the bodies health level is a primary factor, the presence of 'pathogen' becomes quite secondary and not worth chasing anyway. If a seed of grass can wait 100 years for the right conditions to sprout, pathogens can wait around in the body for the right conditions as well. You kill people trying to make them virus free, it's impossible and ill defined but a great way to depopulate a planet.
So I have to ask; given the germ theory folks are as obstinate and (apparently) unwilling to put their theories to a comprehensive test, as in all such cases, cui bono; who benefits from the continued existence of germ theory? And wouldn't proponents do almost anything to shut down any legitimate critique of the theory?
Indeed,
Pharma and the elites benefit, and yes so far they haven't shied away from any action that increases profit/propels their agenda. x
Great Post. I may grant Igor "Amnesty". So far he has not called for the killing of millions like the solid pro-vaccine crowd do. But I still hope he does not cross the line like Steve K. and Alex B. and chat endlessly about "variants" and Antibody yzq etc.
Thank you, I appreciate it 😊
🐒
I fink he already crossed the line... But of course, it could get worse... (let me just hack up dis hairball...)
I was excited for some praxis but when the byline started with the word 'read' I knew it was a dead end...at least for us Americans. :)
I have never heard the word praxis before, very fancy, so I learnt something. Come now there must be lots of Americans who like reading, admittedly very dull, papers on molecular biology!
I think it unfortunately got lodged in my head from listening to the Progressive left wax on for years about how to take over the Democratic party or leave it. So I half hate it as it often gets used by people in a pretentious way but half like it because it cuts through the noise and asks what are the practical steps to be taken.
I find it fascinating to read different perspectives. It's so easy to get swept along and accept the basics of a situation because the discussion is "further along" the path, i.e., lockdowns, masking, sanitizing, etc. Let's see where this all goes.
Yes. Word.
🐒
I think you're right on. Wise and thoughtful comment.
It seems like the more people go to a particular page, often enough it's those pages that seem to be full of people fighting...
I like the little people pages, where they're just folks, honest, normal, lol. I trust them much easier than these "famous" types.
🙏🏽