The all-cause mortality angle has tripped me up a few times already. I wonder if what I had looked at prior took into account the growing and aging population or if that obscured the issue at hand. On my own journey to realizing vaccines could be more dangerous than the virus (let's table the debate on the existence of virus' for a second) had me run into a standoff between Kirsch and Crawford vs. a Medium Series that goes by the pretentious name as 'the gift of fire'. The Gift of Fire people said there wasn't enough room in all cause mortality for Kirsch's estimates of vaccine death. And they through a 100 graphs at the reader then ended by comparing all those critical with the pandemic to QAnon conspiracy theorists. I'd love to hear what you would make of their analysis and graphs that didn't make sense to me. https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/debunking-steve-kirschs-latest-claims-97e1c40f5d74
Fertility reduction and lowered life expectancy due to "side effects"(soft killing). Farmers in the Netherlands using too much "greenhouse gas" nitrogen fertilizer which of course is needed to sustain a sizeable population.WHO writing treaties with countries to overtake their future "pandemic" responses. Pfizer Albert Bourla saying how they're "very much on board with China Agenda 2030". And of course more.
So yes it's depopulation and of course income. However you're correct in your assessment of statistics regarding immediate poisonshot mortality and of course there's not being any "virus".
The problem is population growth of 2% wont necessarily translate into a 2% increase in ACM in the short term. This is because new additions (births and migrants) tend to be younger and healthier and less likely to die. Most deaths are in the elderly and those with gross morbidities
When you are looking in the short term, where population changes are minimal compared to increased deaths of 15 % or more, its best to present the data in the simplest way possible. People don't understand statistics (SD) but they understand numbers
For example, with a relatively stable population Taiwan had 173,000 (+|-3000) deaths per year between 2016-2020 . In 2021 that jumped to 183,000 deaths, and in 2022 it looks to be close to 206,000 deaths (official numbers will be released next week). Only half of these excess deaths were COVID deaths. You don’t need to be a statistician to know something unusual is happening
Also, I have a question, how/why did you misspell monoclonal (twice)?
I mean, you and I both know homogeneity is the bane of creation. Self-similarity, is for instance quite associated with auto-immune diseases, prions, protozoans, cancers, etc.
You know, other than idiocy like patriotism, religion, cult bs and such.
Should I list military, agriculture, pharma, schooling, etc?
Oh I also think it's quite pathetic that substack would try to market, saying "less marketing, more writing"...when that is exactly how cooption based on malice works.
Goodbye substack. You're not required and you're excessive.
The all-cause mortality angle has tripped me up a few times already. I wonder if what I had looked at prior took into account the growing and aging population or if that obscured the issue at hand. On my own journey to realizing vaccines could be more dangerous than the virus (let's table the debate on the existence of virus' for a second) had me run into a standoff between Kirsch and Crawford vs. a Medium Series that goes by the pretentious name as 'the gift of fire'. The Gift of Fire people said there wasn't enough room in all cause mortality for Kirsch's estimates of vaccine death. And they through a 100 graphs at the reader then ended by comparing all those critical with the pandemic to QAnon conspiracy theorists. I'd love to hear what you would make of their analysis and graphs that didn't make sense to me. https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/debunking-steve-kirschs-latest-claims-97e1c40f5d74
Thanks for reminding us of the complexity of calculating excess deaths!
Fertility reduction and lowered life expectancy due to "side effects"(soft killing). Farmers in the Netherlands using too much "greenhouse gas" nitrogen fertilizer which of course is needed to sustain a sizeable population.WHO writing treaties with countries to overtake their future "pandemic" responses. Pfizer Albert Bourla saying how they're "very much on board with China Agenda 2030". And of course more.
So yes it's depopulation and of course income. However you're correct in your assessment of statistics regarding immediate poisonshot mortality and of course there's not being any "virus".
this is interesting https://woodhouse.substack.com/p/thought-experiments
The problem is population growth of 2% wont necessarily translate into a 2% increase in ACM in the short term. This is because new additions (births and migrants) tend to be younger and healthier and less likely to die. Most deaths are in the elderly and those with gross morbidities
When you are looking in the short term, where population changes are minimal compared to increased deaths of 15 % or more, its best to present the data in the simplest way possible. People don't understand statistics (SD) but they understand numbers
For example, with a relatively stable population Taiwan had 173,000 (+|-3000) deaths per year between 2016-2020 . In 2021 that jumped to 183,000 deaths, and in 2022 it looks to be close to 206,000 deaths (official numbers will be released next week). Only half of these excess deaths were COVID deaths. You don’t need to be a statistician to know something unusual is happening
Also, I have a question, how/why did you misspell monoclonal (twice)?
I mean, you and I both know homogeneity is the bane of creation. Self-similarity, is for instance quite associated with auto-immune diseases, prions, protozoans, cancers, etc.
You know, other than idiocy like patriotism, religion, cult bs and such.
Firstly, what's an excess death?
Should I list military, agriculture, pharma, schooling, etc?
Oh I also think it's quite pathetic that substack would try to market, saying "less marketing, more writing"...when that is exactly how cooption based on malice works.
Goodbye substack. You're not required and you're excessive.