Hello Daily Beagle, it 's really annoying to ask a question and then block me. I think you are seriously rattled that I'm right, actually I know that you were because you'd started on ad hominem attacks and questioning my credentials. You seem very confused, how could I be working for Pharma? I'm saying you don't need any vaccines nor hardly any medications. Not much in it for them.
The little video you showed with some florescence markers attached to some RNA sequences or proteins (NEVER shown to come from a virus nor be specific to a virus) in one cell apparently being transferred to another cell does not show viruses entering cells. Would you put the paper where this very dubious, computer enhanced graphics comes from please so we can look at the methodology together. It looks like the whole cell is full of these green markers or completely empty. None of them have a nucleus. It looks like bollocks to me but if you could provide the peer review. Thank you.
Hey ho.
Monagnier said that he'd seen HIV when he hadn't and also said that nutrition could cure AIDS, they do not contradict. They evidence is out of the horses mouth in the Emperor's New Virus video perhaps you'd like to watch linked above.
I ironically titled my post Seeing is believing - I think it was a title of one of Steve Kirsch's where he showed a pic of a particle that looked like everyone said a virus looked like, though no one had ever shown that it was one. How did the original EM techs know that the particles seen on EM were viruses, they could not and did not prove that they were. It would be more accurate for my post to be called Not seeing is Not believing. It was meant to tie in with seeing that the emperor had no clothes.
Animal experiments on transmission of illness ARE bogus, and abusive. Intranasal or intra-abdominal injection of large amounts of proteins is not a normal route of transmission. You HAVE to do controls without the so-called virus. WHY don't they?
Retroviruses as well as parts of the HIV 'genome' are said to be part of the human genome, but as samples are never purified how can they know what was human and what was not. In any case the retrovirus sequences are not viruses, but reverse transcriptases, found in all cells, DNA polymerase enzymes that transcribe single-stranded RNA into DNA, that can be incorporated into other genetic sequences.
In 2020 when Germany was in the throes of hard lockdowns, he noticed those skinny drug addicts living on the streets were unaffected. (People also noticed how the homeless in USA and elsewhere were unaffected,)
He and his mate had to do some industrial cleaning. That place was doused in low frequency radiation. After they finished the job, they developed c19-like symptoms!
Also in 2020 in Melbourne Australia a youtuber noticed a clear association between 5G towers and c19 outbreaks.
For sure! I also noticed that the towers near me are taller and much more powerful than they were this time last year. They read "dangerous" on my Safe and Sound meter.
Industrial cleaning makes me suspicious. Nazi chemicals in industrial cleaning. There is a thing called 'Sick Building Syndrome' due to toxic elements in the building, plastics and the like.
I do not think it to be easy to assess how bad radiatinon affects us.
Since I was a ham radio amateuer, I like sending out waves. Even 100W.
Though I'm quite sensitive, this never caused me any problem. The information density is low, and the modulation seems key.
And I do not deny that "headology", as Granny Weatherwax (Equal Rites and many more) of Terry Pratchett puts it, is key. If you think in the right way, that you have NO problem, you won't have one, as the world changes in infinitesimal ways just to that account. ;)
So let us think the right things, and still try to push back radiation where easy to re-do, cheap, available, safe and effective and transparent experiments show it is detrimental.
Something that is more stationary, like a plant, but fast reacting to observe changes to our naked eye?
I like the ant experiment, will do it one day, where ants avoid a smartphone with active radiation.
Here you can cause constant activity eg by downloading/speedtesting or some dummy video phone call.
I would just keep the display dark so no graphics heat up the device.
Simultaneously, I would look at the case temperature (CAT S60 or S61 ff have heat camera built in, so you can watch), to try to assess if the avoiding effect is done by case temperature. Do a second device rising its temperature offline, so without the radiation, eg by calculating 3D or running a game etc..
In the future, I will again invest some time to go wired, but I would like to use polymer fibres, not having ground current or surge protecting problems, and attaching smartphones to some PC where they can get internet via USB cable.
We recently tried to DIY some router, used a raspi, attached some old USB docking station having a Ethernet port, and did the same with an old Android phone USB-C to USB-A On-the-go adaptor, then plugged in some ethernet dongle, and voila, we could surf.
(We wanted some wlan AP, which both can also do.)
For the ones not reducing to 0:
To reduce WLAN, the strategy is not to have the Access Point farthest away, but to have a decent box near you. Only then both devices regulate transmitting power down. I want to have a measure for that, and here a standard EMV meter with WLAN bands receiving capability will do, but I want one that has quantitative readings and spits out frequency and modulation type.
Nokia once has shown that a mciro-mobile concept greatly reduced EMV exposition when one leaves out all the DECT and WLAN bases in a corporate appproach.
So doing it in the right way is the path.
Not hiding with the head in the sand.
But I have to learn so much about energy of live, and if and when technology interfers.
As I have the impression, that it is good to give bad things the least attention as possible.
Beautiful, don't trust the science trust your bodies.
Look closely at any one system of our body, the heart as a pump, the kidneys, the immune system... Each of them on their own is a miracle. The fact that we have many of these systems interacting is truly a miracle of biology.
thank you. The mind can't conceive of how miraculous and amazing the body and life itself is, if it did it would explode! That's why we reduce it to little bits of understanding I think! The body understands the whole shaboodle
The "immune system" is a made up term, in an effort to explain away why some people get sick, but others don't - due to the false belief of contagion. It is just another product of germ THEORY.
This is something I am somewhat surprised to see people who comprehend that germ theory is utter bullshit, yet still talk about "strengthening ones immune system".... there is nothing to be immune from, there is no "immune system".
We need to really re-evaluate everything and not just the "germ", so as to not perpetuate the lies & confusion of Rockefeller medicine.
Are you saying there is not evidence for what the cells attributed to the immune system do? (T cells, B cells, etc).
There is biological material that causes symptoms in the human body, like when a wound gets infected antibiotics help. Parasites can get into the body. There are other biological material besides so called "viruses", and the cells of our body attributed to the immune system respond to these things.
Hello, thank you for reading and yes I think that there is evidence that the cells in the body have many functions in producing the symptoms of detoxification and healing, they cause inflammation and fever, mucus etc as well as what we called 'antibodies' (produced in up to 30 times the titre a few weeks after a detox) that return the body back to normal after a healing crisis https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/if-viruses-dont-exist-what-about
The biological material in the body other than 'human' cells such as fungi, bacteria and parasites are essential to our health and we can't live without them. The microbiome protects and nourishes the gut, brain, kidney and skin barriers. Bacteria that is always present in the body may proliferate when the body is out of balance but this appears to be beneficial in most cases as they consume and remove dead cells. Those struggling with detox and in extremis do benefit from antibiotics but the bacteria are not the cause of the symptoms, the imbalance is the cause https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/a-tiny-water-flea-has-31000-genes An 'infected' wound is one that is not kept clean nor fresh dressed, if the body is supported the wound should heal without damaging the microbiome with antibiotics. Bacteria themselves are not pathogenic but they do produce toxins in rotting flesh and stagnant water
Bacteria, fungi, and parasites do not invade the body. All of them serve a function (including parasites) - they are attempting to bring balance to the microbiome.
However. I stand by my comment. There is no "immune system" because there is nothing to be "immune" from. I think it is problematic for those who understand terrain theory to keep using that word.... it conflicts with the entire concept of terrain theory.
I also believe that what we THINK we know about cells, and how the body works is questionable - especially when you consider how we came to these conclusions in the first place. A lab is not a natural setting. And lab experiments are not even close to what happens in nature. "Antibodies" for example are non-specific. Since there are no pathogens invading the body, there is no possible way there are specific "antibodies" being created to "fight off" these pathogens, resulting in "immunity" for life. You can find "antibodies" present in people showing NO signs of symptoms or DIS-ease, and you also find NO antibodies in people showing signs of symptoms and DIS-ease.
Just some food for thought...
We need to seriously reconsider what we think we know, and stop looking at everything from such a synthetic, unnatural perspective, using chemicals, electron microscopes, etc. All that does is guarantee artifacts & manipulated man-made results which cannot possibly represent what happens naturally.
You are right labs are completely not the place to learn about the body and all microscopes produce (incredibly consistent) artefacts and snap shots in time of what's in cells, but mammals do produce substances that are specific to target proteins (not pathogens) injected into them. I can't find any other way of explaining them than the body made them. They are involved in homeostasis and the recognition of foreign substances (lots of substance come into the body through the orifices and skin, they need to be dealt with too not just non existent pathogens). They have been mislabelled antibodies, they are not anti, they bind to proteins produced by the body itself in the convalescent phase of detox to bring it back to balance, so yes found in people with no symptoms (after detox) and not found in people with symptoms (during detox), because they are not 'fighting' non existent pathogens, they are recognition and homeostatic substances. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/if-viruses-dont-exist-what-about just some food for thought. I don't think we throw everything away as long as we realise we are looking threw a glass darkly.
It is very easy and convenient to say everything is wrong when there are things that we think can't be explained by our theory.
I know I am disagreeing with Scoglio, Tom Cowan and Mike Stone. Shocking isn't it!
Yes there are definitely concepts that are complete and utter nonsense/dont exist (viruses), and there are other concepts that do exist but are not what we are told (antibodies).
Think im going to use Steve Falconer's word from now on and call it "glue-bulin" (sp? Idk how itd be spelled, but thats what im going with for now lol) 😁 because it binds with proteins- like a glue - but nothing to do with immunity.
Yes we could definitely use some new words as the old ones give completely the wrong impression- could it be glubelin?
The word immunity is the most problematic and politically loaded, it implies that someone can never again be harmed by prosecuters, persecutors, invaders or hurtful words ever again.
the first entries in the OED; Plutarch Morals 1116 What be those then.. who are accompanied with this immunity, that they can neither be hurt nor diseased?
a1650 Nat. Hist. (1652) The immunity from certain diseases consisteth in the air, not in the bodies of the people. ! I wonder what that meant?
1866 Lancet Now it has been found that after continued inoculation the body will enter into a state of immunity from further inoculation with syphilitic matter.
this sounds like dosing
1892 Pop. Sci. Monthly Acquired immunity depends upon the formation of an antitoxine in the body of the immune animal. - The body can learn to deal with toxins by dosing, but only up to a certain level.
Now of course we label hundreds of different types of cell the 'immune system' it's very misleading - we are never immune to anything- our body may be able to cope with it and detox it but it will still cause stress and oxidation in the body
1925 H. L. Mencken Let. 1 Apr. The main business is to raise your immunity, and the way to do it is to keep your nourishment high.- an early terrain theorist?
I must and I will. I know it is not difficult as I mirror posts from my WordPress site from when I started substack pages beginning of April. Thanks for encouraging/reminding me.
Holy kamoly! Pirates wore eye patches by day to protect one eye from ‘night blindness’ caused by days of glaring sunlight. That way they could see at night. Never knew this.
This is a bit off topic but I have seen so many people that say cancer can be cured by a carrot diet or an all veggie and fruit diet pushing many of the vitamins that contain vitamin A. What the writer suggests is that too much vitamin A turns to retinoic acid in or bodies and eventually will kill cells. He says retinoic acid is in chemotherapy drugs. Made me wonder if these alternative med veggie and fruit diets don’t cause vitamin A toxicity to some extent and thus create retinoic acid, like a natural ‘chemo.’ And thus a cure?
Cancer, it turns out, is a metabolic disease, and inflammation is involved to a huge extent. Dashing off right now, but just wanted to mention that strictly no-carb diets have shown a lot of success in reversing cancer.
Only ancedotally- some cancers actually fed on cholesterol, i know someone who went blind from diabetic neuropathy mistakingly thinking a high saturated fat would starve his cancer, which he died from, I think it's dangerous and unscientific. The best diet for anti cancer is an anti inflammtory one full of anti oxidants etc = plant based.
Chemotherapy drugs are a scam like other big pharma drugs. Alternative med veggie and fruit diets can’t cause vitamin A toxicity as the toxicity has to be extremely high I gather.
My wife tells and amusing story about her friend, a trainee nurse at the time, who thought eating lots of carrots would help her with night vision on the wards.
Apparently she went rather yellow as a consequence! I believe she and her husband who must be around 70 years old now took the vaccines, so the passing years don't seem to have brought her medical wisdom.
My anorexic neighbour at college ate loads of carrots (they served them a lot in the canteen) she went quite orange. I don't think you can eat enough from veg to be toxic, but the urban myth is that eating polar bear liver could kill you with hypervitaminosis A
Similarly to you, I’ve become skeptical of what I am told. I’ll always ask more questions than I have in the past, possibly start asking questions like “Can you show me under a microscope?” - they claim my wife is a carrier of Fragile X - all they did was a test, but can we see the “damaged” X chromosome?
Interesting- I know a fragile X family, the mother the alleged carrier and the son, the most wonderful, affectionate man you could ever meet, who neither of his parents would change for the world, affected more than the daughter.
Scientists can see the X chromosome but this is not the test used- which is the PCR- primed to look for for repeats of the CGG mutation on the FMR1 gene. Apparently 1 in 260 women test positive - and fragile X only affects 1/11000 boys- so many so called 'positive' carrier women will not pass anything on. The PCR, as we all probably know now, has an arbitrary cut off point determining positive and negative and depends on how many cycles are used. It is not really a test- it amplifies DNA so that it can be studied. It will pick up just one copy of a sequence-which would in reality turn out to be completely harmless.
I think it is generally another win for the testing and Pharma industries.
PCR is a money making scam like all other big p-harm-a exercises. PCR reminded me of PRC where many of the tests are no doubt made. Add an 'A' to letters and reorder to make sense.
various molds have been honing their chemical warfare for endless ages and there is a significant percentage of people who react to mold-toxins with a cytokine storm as opposed to mere allergy symptoms. Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker has estimated that number as 25%.
I'm really interested in this question over how disease appears, and much of the "no virus" information makes sense, such as less disease with clean water and good sanitation - but this question remains:
How did smallpox (and other Old World diseases) cause such devastation in indigenous New World peoples, who had not suffered from it before?
There is also the accusation that the Europeans deliberately infected them using blankets that carried the virus and possibly in other ways.
Conventional theory says they had little to no defense against smallpox etc. because their immune systems had not encountered the virus previously. Thank you.
there is also no evidence that 'smallpox' is a distinct disease- the body detoxes through the skin by forming poxes (chicken pox seems to be a develpmental phase) and pustules. There is no evidence that having a certain set ofdetox symptoms once- like those labelled smallpox- stops you getting them again https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/lets-hope-the-monkey-pox-nonsense
yeah I'm sure we've spoken but don't think it was a post I don't like to share her cos she banned me, but have you seen Sam Bailey's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G3JbbaGhqc
I saw you talking about aluminium with someone, the experiments defiantly used cuts in plants to add the concentrated brew.
the mottled thing looks like nutrient deficiency to me.
In the UK those who died with alleged ‘Covid’ had a median age of 83 and this was following 5 years of very low deaths in an increasingly ageing population.
Florence Nightingale 2.0 “ ‘Covid’ smells like murder, not a virus.’
Still intrigued and digesting… Are you suggesting, or would you say, that the 1918 flu was a world-wide detox from the various physical, psychological, and emotional stresses of WWI? When the war ended, people were able to release the trauma. (I have to admit I sometimes need to skim because of time constraints or too much info at once, so excuse me for asking something you may have just written.)
being 'intrigued' is all that matters and Yes that is what I'm saying.🐒
Skim through this as well, it's got lots of pictures! It's not just the 1918 effects of war and toxins on health- it's all disease. they couldn't pin bacteria onto them, so the medical profession postulated, never proved or demonstrated that unseen, tiny particles caused symptoms. Now we are asked the very dumb question 'what does cause someone who has been bombed and gased not to be at the top of their game?' and asked to prove that unseen entities are not involved. No one ever demonstrated 'viruses' in the first place! https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/were-so-far-down-the-rabbit-hole
Hi and thanks for the link. I read the article. So many questions, but some have answers which are satisfactory while others have a trail of more questions following them. The graphs helped because almost every “disease’s” death rate falls flat around 1950, regardless of when its “vaccine” came out (usually very late in the day, and long after the disease had had its heyday).
Okay, so the pustules of “small pox” were in fact toxic, meaning that when they were injected or inserted into cuts in the arm, the person got sick or even died if the toxin was too much for them. Has anyone examined what the pustules were composed of? Were they made up of lead, arsenic, etc? Or did the body recompose the toxins prior to eliminating them? How would poor nutrition cause a pustule to form?
Yes, Northern Italy and Wuhan may have both had the earliest 5G rollout (Wuhan was October 2019, corona was the same month), but what other factors played a role in Italy? It’s nowhere near as polluted as I imagine China is. I can imagine that the stealth installation during the night of countless 5G towers could have been programmed to emit at certain moments to cause “outbreaks”, even down to the houses on certain streets. This seems more likely in a sense than detoxing at the same time. I have not noticed people catching anything from me. I detox emotionally all the time. They aren’t joining me in that. So why would they join me physically? I thin consent even at a subconscious level would need to play a role. I can see that people got sick with “corona” symptoms as a result of the fear wearing them out. And the stress of the fearful household members wearing others down…
Poor nutrition affects everything as it maintains the microbiome which maintains homeostasis and enables the body in all its healing and repair. When it's not working properly the body can't detox through the usual routes effectively. Scurvy manifests with all sorts of spots and rashes on the skin too.
What is little known is that there was a "flu vaccination" campaign shortly before the "flu pandemic", and this is what caused the symptoms and even deaths. It affected young, healthy people the most because their reactions were the strongest, and caused their lungs to become inflamed and fill with fluid that they couldn't get rid of fast enough.
So it wasn't a pandemic, it was a mass adverse reaction to a pharmaceutical.
The last time the world had a pandemic was, at latest, about 500 years ago.
So all this rot about expecting pandemics every 3 years is utter bs. Even IF you subscribe to germ theory.
Hello, the DNA misunderstanding thing is definitely on my radar. The 'DNA' in the X and Y chromosomes consistently relate to gender though so something happening, or at least correlated with. Could you explain what you mean by hoax a bit more please?
Hello Daily Beagle, it 's really annoying to ask a question and then block me. I think you are seriously rattled that I'm right, actually I know that you were because you'd started on ad hominem attacks and questioning my credentials. You seem very confused, how could I be working for Pharma? I'm saying you don't need any vaccines nor hardly any medications. Not much in it for them.
The little video you showed with some florescence markers attached to some RNA sequences or proteins (NEVER shown to come from a virus nor be specific to a virus) in one cell apparently being transferred to another cell does not show viruses entering cells. Would you put the paper where this very dubious, computer enhanced graphics comes from please so we can look at the methodology together. It looks like the whole cell is full of these green markers or completely empty. None of them have a nucleus. It looks like bollocks to me but if you could provide the peer review. Thank you.
Hey ho.
Monagnier said that he'd seen HIV when he hadn't and also said that nutrition could cure AIDS, they do not contradict. They evidence is out of the horses mouth in the Emperor's New Virus video perhaps you'd like to watch linked above.
I ironically titled my post Seeing is believing - I think it was a title of one of Steve Kirsch's where he showed a pic of a particle that looked like everyone said a virus looked like, though no one had ever shown that it was one. How did the original EM techs know that the particles seen on EM were viruses, they could not and did not prove that they were. It would be more accurate for my post to be called Not seeing is Not believing. It was meant to tie in with seeing that the emperor had no clothes.
Animal experiments on transmission of illness ARE bogus, and abusive. Intranasal or intra-abdominal injection of large amounts of proteins is not a normal route of transmission. You HAVE to do controls without the so-called virus. WHY don't they?
Retroviruses as well as parts of the HIV 'genome' are said to be part of the human genome, but as samples are never purified how can they know what was human and what was not. In any case the retrovirus sequences are not viruses, but reverse transcriptases, found in all cells, DNA polymerase enzymes that transcribe single-stranded RNA into DNA, that can be incorporated into other genetic sequences.
Hey ho.
Electro-magnetic radiations - EMR.
In 2021 a German guy on Telegram told me this:
In 2020 when Germany was in the throes of hard lockdowns, he noticed those skinny drug addicts living on the streets were unaffected. (People also noticed how the homeless in USA and elsewhere were unaffected,)
He and his mate had to do some industrial cleaning. That place was doused in low frequency radiation. After they finished the job, they developed c19-like symptoms!
Also in 2020 in Melbourne Australia a youtuber noticed a clear association between 5G towers and c19 outbreaks.
yes, this, definitely
How did they “notice a clear association”? Haven’t we had 5G towers for more than 2 years?
Good question. I think the towers were progressively installed.
Who really knows how they actually use those towers?
Fact: 5G and towers are NOT healthy.
For sure! I also noticed that the towers near me are taller and much more powerful than they were this time last year. They read "dangerous" on my Safe and Sound meter.
Who knows when they’re turned on or off. They may do this selectively to cause “outbreaks”.
Industrial cleaning makes me suspicious. Nazi chemicals in industrial cleaning. There is a thing called 'Sick Building Syndrome' due to toxic elements in the building, plastics and the like.
Yes, quite right to be suspicious 🙏🏽
Does anyone have a good cheap organic meter?
I do not think it to be easy to assess how bad radiatinon affects us.
Since I was a ham radio amateuer, I like sending out waves. Even 100W.
Though I'm quite sensitive, this never caused me any problem. The information density is low, and the modulation seems key.
And I do not deny that "headology", as Granny Weatherwax (Equal Rites and many more) of Terry Pratchett puts it, is key. If you think in the right way, that you have NO problem, you won't have one, as the world changes in infinitesimal ways just to that account. ;)
So let us think the right things, and still try to push back radiation where easy to re-do, cheap, available, safe and effective and transparent experiments show it is detrimental.
Something that is more stationary, like a plant, but fast reacting to observe changes to our naked eye?
I like the ant experiment, will do it one day, where ants avoid a smartphone with active radiation.
Here you can cause constant activity eg by downloading/speedtesting or some dummy video phone call.
I would just keep the display dark so no graphics heat up the device.
Simultaneously, I would look at the case temperature (CAT S60 or S61 ff have heat camera built in, so you can watch), to try to assess if the avoiding effect is done by case temperature. Do a second device rising its temperature offline, so without the radiation, eg by calculating 3D or running a game etc..
In the future, I will again invest some time to go wired, but I would like to use polymer fibres, not having ground current or surge protecting problems, and attaching smartphones to some PC where they can get internet via USB cable.
We recently tried to DIY some router, used a raspi, attached some old USB docking station having a Ethernet port, and did the same with an old Android phone USB-C to USB-A On-the-go adaptor, then plugged in some ethernet dongle, and voila, we could surf.
(We wanted some wlan AP, which both can also do.)
For the ones not reducing to 0:
To reduce WLAN, the strategy is not to have the Access Point farthest away, but to have a decent box near you. Only then both devices regulate transmitting power down. I want to have a measure for that, and here a standard EMV meter with WLAN bands receiving capability will do, but I want one that has quantitative readings and spits out frequency and modulation type.
Nokia once has shown that a mciro-mobile concept greatly reduced EMV exposition when one leaves out all the DECT and WLAN bases in a corporate appproach.
So doing it in the right way is the path.
Not hiding with the head in the sand.
But I have to learn so much about energy of live, and if and when technology interfers.
As I have the impression, that it is good to give bad things the least attention as possible.
And meanwhile improve on learning.
Try to learn more about Wilhelm Reich now...
Beautiful, don't trust the science trust your bodies.
Look closely at any one system of our body, the heart as a pump, the kidneys, the immune system... Each of them on their own is a miracle. The fact that we have many of these systems interacting is truly a miracle of biology.
thank you. The mind can't conceive of how miraculous and amazing the body and life itself is, if it did it would explode! That's why we reduce it to little bits of understanding I think! The body understands the whole shaboodle
The "immune system" is a made up term, in an effort to explain away why some people get sick, but others don't - due to the false belief of contagion. It is just another product of germ THEORY.
This is something I am somewhat surprised to see people who comprehend that germ theory is utter bullshit, yet still talk about "strengthening ones immune system".... there is nothing to be immune from, there is no "immune system".
We need to really re-evaluate everything and not just the "germ", so as to not perpetuate the lies & confusion of Rockefeller medicine.
Are you saying there is not evidence for what the cells attributed to the immune system do? (T cells, B cells, etc).
There is biological material that causes symptoms in the human body, like when a wound gets infected antibiotics help. Parasites can get into the body. There are other biological material besides so called "viruses", and the cells of our body attributed to the immune system respond to these things.
Hello, thank you for reading and yes I think that there is evidence that the cells in the body have many functions in producing the symptoms of detoxification and healing, they cause inflammation and fever, mucus etc as well as what we called 'antibodies' (produced in up to 30 times the titre a few weeks after a detox) that return the body back to normal after a healing crisis https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/if-viruses-dont-exist-what-about
The biological material in the body other than 'human' cells such as fungi, bacteria and parasites are essential to our health and we can't live without them. The microbiome protects and nourishes the gut, brain, kidney and skin barriers. Bacteria that is always present in the body may proliferate when the body is out of balance but this appears to be beneficial in most cases as they consume and remove dead cells. Those struggling with detox and in extremis do benefit from antibiotics but the bacteria are not the cause of the symptoms, the imbalance is the cause https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/a-tiny-water-flea-has-31000-genes An 'infected' wound is one that is not kept clean nor fresh dressed, if the body is supported the wound should heal without damaging the microbiome with antibiotics. Bacteria themselves are not pathogenic but they do produce toxins in rotting flesh and stagnant water
Jo
🙏🏽
Good points, thank you. 👍🏽
You're very welcome 😺
Bacteria, fungi, and parasites do not invade the body. All of them serve a function (including parasites) - they are attempting to bring balance to the microbiome.
However. I stand by my comment. There is no "immune system" because there is nothing to be "immune" from. I think it is problematic for those who understand terrain theory to keep using that word.... it conflicts with the entire concept of terrain theory.
I also believe that what we THINK we know about cells, and how the body works is questionable - especially when you consider how we came to these conclusions in the first place. A lab is not a natural setting. And lab experiments are not even close to what happens in nature. "Antibodies" for example are non-specific. Since there are no pathogens invading the body, there is no possible way there are specific "antibodies" being created to "fight off" these pathogens, resulting in "immunity" for life. You can find "antibodies" present in people showing NO signs of symptoms or DIS-ease, and you also find NO antibodies in people showing signs of symptoms and DIS-ease.
Just some food for thought...
We need to seriously reconsider what we think we know, and stop looking at everything from such a synthetic, unnatural perspective, using chemicals, electron microscopes, etc. All that does is guarantee artifacts & manipulated man-made results which cannot possibly represent what happens naturally.
You are right labs are completely not the place to learn about the body and all microscopes produce (incredibly consistent) artefacts and snap shots in time of what's in cells, but mammals do produce substances that are specific to target proteins (not pathogens) injected into them. I can't find any other way of explaining them than the body made them. They are involved in homeostasis and the recognition of foreign substances (lots of substance come into the body through the orifices and skin, they need to be dealt with too not just non existent pathogens). They have been mislabelled antibodies, they are not anti, they bind to proteins produced by the body itself in the convalescent phase of detox to bring it back to balance, so yes found in people with no symptoms (after detox) and not found in people with symptoms (during detox), because they are not 'fighting' non existent pathogens, they are recognition and homeostatic substances. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/if-viruses-dont-exist-what-about just some food for thought. I don't think we throw everything away as long as we realise we are looking threw a glass darkly.
It is very easy and convenient to say everything is wrong when there are things that we think can't be explained by our theory.
I know I am disagreeing with Scoglio, Tom Cowan and Mike Stone. Shocking isn't it!
🙏🏽
Yes there are definitely concepts that are complete and utter nonsense/dont exist (viruses), and there are other concepts that do exist but are not what we are told (antibodies).
Think im going to use Steve Falconer's word from now on and call it "glue-bulin" (sp? Idk how itd be spelled, but thats what im going with for now lol) 😁 because it binds with proteins- like a glue - but nothing to do with immunity.
Yes we could definitely use some new words as the old ones give completely the wrong impression- could it be glubelin?
The word immunity is the most problematic and politically loaded, it implies that someone can never again be harmed by prosecuters, persecutors, invaders or hurtful words ever again.
the first entries in the OED; Plutarch Morals 1116 What be those then.. who are accompanied with this immunity, that they can neither be hurt nor diseased?
a1650 Nat. Hist. (1652) The immunity from certain diseases consisteth in the air, not in the bodies of the people. ! I wonder what that meant?
1866 Lancet Now it has been found that after continued inoculation the body will enter into a state of immunity from further inoculation with syphilitic matter.
this sounds like dosing
1892 Pop. Sci. Monthly Acquired immunity depends upon the formation of an antitoxine in the body of the immune animal. - The body can learn to deal with toxins by dosing, but only up to a certain level.
Now of course we label hundreds of different types of cell the 'immune system' it's very misleading - we are never immune to anything- our body may be able to cope with it and detox it but it will still cause stress and oxidation in the body
1925 H. L. Mencken Let. 1 Apr. The main business is to raise your immunity, and the way to do it is to keep your nourishment high.- an early terrain theorist?
Jo
And very like the houses we dwell in. But then our spirit or soul dwells in our bodies, so makes sense. All planned and made by a creator.
thank you Liz and for the link 🙏🏽
another angle for y'all on toxicity.
https://ggenereux.blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/PoisoningForProfits.pdf
Thank you very much. It is very long but looks good at first glance! I did a short piece myself the other day.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
and a longer one with various sub-links.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
These are really good, any chance you could pop them on substack?
I must and I will. I know it is not difficult as I mirror posts from my WordPress site from when I started substack pages beginning of April. Thanks for encouraging/reminding me.
I look forward to commenting on them!
Thank you, published just now.
Looks long? Haha it’s 370 pages!
Holy kamoly! Pirates wore eye patches by day to protect one eye from ‘night blindness’ caused by days of glaring sunlight. That way they could see at night. Never knew this.
This is a bit off topic but I have seen so many people that say cancer can be cured by a carrot diet or an all veggie and fruit diet pushing many of the vitamins that contain vitamin A. What the writer suggests is that too much vitamin A turns to retinoic acid in or bodies and eventually will kill cells. He says retinoic acid is in chemotherapy drugs. Made me wonder if these alternative med veggie and fruit diets don’t cause vitamin A toxicity to some extent and thus create retinoic acid, like a natural ‘chemo.’ And thus a cure?
Don’t know if any of you care or know.
Cancer, it turns out, is a metabolic disease, and inflammation is involved to a huge extent. Dashing off right now, but just wanted to mention that strictly no-carb diets have shown a lot of success in reversing cancer.
Only ancedotally- some cancers actually fed on cholesterol, i know someone who went blind from diabetic neuropathy mistakingly thinking a high saturated fat would starve his cancer, which he died from, I think it's dangerous and unscientific. The best diet for anti cancer is an anti inflammtory one full of anti oxidants etc = plant based.
Chemotherapy drugs are a scam like other big pharma drugs. Alternative med veggie and fruit diets can’t cause vitamin A toxicity as the toxicity has to be extremely high I gather.
My wife tells and amusing story about her friend, a trainee nurse at the time, who thought eating lots of carrots would help her with night vision on the wards.
Apparently she went rather yellow as a consequence! I believe she and her husband who must be around 70 years old now took the vaccines, so the passing years don't seem to have brought her medical wisdom.
My anorexic neighbour at college ate loads of carrots (they served them a lot in the canteen) she went quite orange. I don't think you can eat enough from veg to be toxic, but the urban myth is that eating polar bear liver could kill you with hypervitaminosis A
Thanks! Amusingly, 'irreparable' and 'pallbearer' are the top two single longest part anagrams out of 'polar bear liver'.
'Ivor pallbearer' is a full anagram so the possibility of death seems reasonable!
I've come up with an anagram for Gates and Musk full names- but it's a bit rude
Great write-up. Learning this stuff the past year or two has truly opened my eyes and led me to question so much behind modern science and “medicine”.
Hello,
Thank you, I really appreciate it.
Yes me too 100%. 2020 onwards has been the most incredible eye opener ever. I keep wondering what else have we got completely wrong?
Its been very empowering as well though- I never will trust an expert ever again- I'm the expert on my health now.
Always learning,
Jo
Similarly to you, I’ve become skeptical of what I am told. I’ll always ask more questions than I have in the past, possibly start asking questions like “Can you show me under a microscope?” - they claim my wife is a carrier of Fragile X - all they did was a test, but can we see the “damaged” X chromosome?
Hiya,
Interesting- I know a fragile X family, the mother the alleged carrier and the son, the most wonderful, affectionate man you could ever meet, who neither of his parents would change for the world, affected more than the daughter.
Scientists can see the X chromosome but this is not the test used- which is the PCR- primed to look for for repeats of the CGG mutation on the FMR1 gene. Apparently 1 in 260 women test positive - and fragile X only affects 1/11000 boys- so many so called 'positive' carrier women will not pass anything on. The PCR, as we all probably know now, has an arbitrary cut off point determining positive and negative and depends on how many cycles are used. It is not really a test- it amplifies DNA so that it can be studied. It will pick up just one copy of a sequence-which would in reality turn out to be completely harmless.
I think it is generally another win for the testing and Pharma industries.
Jo
PCR is a money making scam like all other big p-harm-a exercises. PCR reminded me of PRC where many of the tests are no doubt made. Add an 'A' to letters and reorder to make sense.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/05/03/pcr-and-rapid-lateral-flow-tests/
Indeed, 2020 I woke up at 60 years of age. About time I said to myself, but better late than never.
nice job, thanks, will share it around some.
Thank you, that would be awesome
various molds have been honing their chemical warfare for endless ages and there is a significant percentage of people who react to mold-toxins with a cytokine storm as opposed to mere allergy symptoms. Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker has estimated that number as 25%.
https://www.survivingmold.com/about/ritchie-shoemaker-m-d
it's almost uncanny how many toxicities fit under the "covid umbrella".
I'm really interested in this question over how disease appears, and much of the "no virus" information makes sense, such as less disease with clean water and good sanitation - but this question remains:
How did smallpox (and other Old World diseases) cause such devastation in indigenous New World peoples, who had not suffered from it before?
There is also the accusation that the Europeans deliberately infected them using blankets that carried the virus and possibly in other ways.
Conventional theory says they had little to no defense against smallpox etc. because their immune systems had not encountered the virus previously. Thank you.
Hiya, I think i answer your questions about old world diseases here https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/disease-and-colonialism
there is also no evidence that 'smallpox' is a distinct disease- the body detoxes through the skin by forming poxes (chicken pox seems to be a develpmental phase) and pustules. There is no evidence that having a certain set ofdetox symptoms once- like those labelled smallpox- stops you getting them again https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/lets-hope-the-monkey-pox-nonsense
as regards respiratory disease https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/some-people-say-we-dont-know-why
thanks for reading
On top of all you said in Wuhan, many people (often men) smoke.
Shouted set up to me, year of..what? Dragon?, EVERYONE goes, then freely goes home even though their 'disease' is detected.
The cruelty in China over their Covered(C-19 is over the top.)
good point thank you
Have you done a post on the OG experiment of virology. Tobacco mosaic virus. I can't find it but feel we've talked about it in comments before.
yeah I'm sure we've spoken but don't think it was a post I don't like to share her cos she banned me, but have you seen Sam Bailey's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G3JbbaGhqc
I saw you talking about aluminium with someone, the experiments defiantly used cuts in plants to add the concentrated brew.
the mottled thing looks like nutrient deficiency to me.
In the UK those who died with alleged ‘Covid’ had a median age of 83 and this was following 5 years of very low deaths in an increasingly ageing population.
Florence Nightingale 2.0 “ ‘Covid’ smells like murder, not a virus.’
Yes! I'm putting that in.
Still intrigued and digesting… Are you suggesting, or would you say, that the 1918 flu was a world-wide detox from the various physical, psychological, and emotional stresses of WWI? When the war ended, people were able to release the trauma. (I have to admit I sometimes need to skim because of time constraints or too much info at once, so excuse me for asking something you may have just written.)
Hiya
being 'intrigued' is all that matters and Yes that is what I'm saying.🐒
Skim through this as well, it's got lots of pictures! It's not just the 1918 effects of war and toxins on health- it's all disease. they couldn't pin bacteria onto them, so the medical profession postulated, never proved or demonstrated that unseen, tiny particles caused symptoms. Now we are asked the very dumb question 'what does cause someone who has been bombed and gased not to be at the top of their game?' and asked to prove that unseen entities are not involved. No one ever demonstrated 'viruses' in the first place! https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/were-so-far-down-the-rabbit-hole
🙏🏽
Hi and thanks for the link. I read the article. So many questions, but some have answers which are satisfactory while others have a trail of more questions following them. The graphs helped because almost every “disease’s” death rate falls flat around 1950, regardless of when its “vaccine” came out (usually very late in the day, and long after the disease had had its heyday).
Okay, so the pustules of “small pox” were in fact toxic, meaning that when they were injected or inserted into cuts in the arm, the person got sick or even died if the toxin was too much for them. Has anyone examined what the pustules were composed of? Were they made up of lead, arsenic, etc? Or did the body recompose the toxins prior to eliminating them? How would poor nutrition cause a pustule to form?
Yes, Northern Italy and Wuhan may have both had the earliest 5G rollout (Wuhan was October 2019, corona was the same month), but what other factors played a role in Italy? It’s nowhere near as polluted as I imagine China is. I can imagine that the stealth installation during the night of countless 5G towers could have been programmed to emit at certain moments to cause “outbreaks”, even down to the houses on certain streets. This seems more likely in a sense than detoxing at the same time. I have not noticed people catching anything from me. I detox emotionally all the time. They aren’t joining me in that. So why would they join me physically? I thin consent even at a subconscious level would need to play a role. I can see that people got sick with “corona” symptoms as a result of the fear wearing them out. And the stress of the fearful household members wearing others down…
I think you will answer all your own questions.
Poor nutrition affects everything as it maintains the microbiome which maintains homeostasis and enables the body in all its healing and repair. When it's not working properly the body can't detox through the usual routes effectively. Scurvy manifests with all sorts of spots and rashes on the skin too.
🙏🏽
Hence the lab meat and crickets. Thanks for the answers!
What is little known is that there was a "flu vaccination" campaign shortly before the "flu pandemic", and this is what caused the symptoms and even deaths. It affected young, healthy people the most because their reactions were the strongest, and caused their lungs to become inflamed and fill with fluid that they couldn't get rid of fast enough.
So it wasn't a pandemic, it was a mass adverse reaction to a pharmaceutical.
The last time the world had a pandemic was, at latest, about 500 years ago.
So all this rot about expecting pandemics every 3 years is utter bs. Even IF you subscribe to germ theory.
I'm not sure there's ever been a pandemic! https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/the-black-death-killed-50-of-the
Love the slogan love the thought process you get it although I think DNA is a hoax.
Thank you, yes - DNA certainly doesn't do what we think it does-I'm sure everything in the cell in fact isn't what we think it is either
Hello, the DNA misunderstanding thing is definitely on my radar. The 'DNA' in the X and Y chromosomes consistently relate to gender though so something happening, or at least correlated with. Could you explain what you mean by hoax a bit more please?
Nice, succinct explanation of the hoax.
Thank you, I've been working on it awhile, and keep trying to cut my waffle and make it punchier and punchier!
Yes giving big p-harm-a the old one-two. Left, right, left, right, left, right and big p-harm-a are flawed (sic).
Bust the emperor for indecent exposure!
LOL