The largest increase compared to 2021 (the next highest) was 0.4 deaths/100,000 for colon cancer in 15-44 year olds, so 60 more deaths from colon cancer in about 15 million people in 2022 than 2021. This is a variance up and down we would expect from year to year. It is not an explosion. It may be due to all sorts of factors; lack of exercise during lockdowns, reliance on takeaways and increasing obesity.
The problem with the report is the confusion of death rates with 'excess deaths'. Excess deaths are relative to previous years. For example the average for 10 years may be 10 deaths; the next year there may be 15 deaths which is an increase of 50%. This will look alarming when, as they have done, it is represented on a chart. However when looking at previous years you see that deaths have previously gone up or down by around 5, thus averaging 10. A graph showing 50% increase in deaths (the highest was 74% in the alarmist article) is NOT alarming when you look at the original data and see that it represents an increase of 5 deaths in 60 million people.
10 years is not long enough to see definite trends nor to draw a line of best fit, which they've done, there are not enough data points. This article claims that 2022 bucked the downward skin cancer trend, which is not justified from this amount of data; skin cancer deaths were going up and down. A tiny increase of 15 more deaths in 2022 than 2020 may be due to people not getting their moles checked during lockdown? However there were 30 more deaths from skin cancer in 2015 than in 2022!
Not being a statistician my comments should be taken with a grain of salt...but I believe the percent increase is very significant (and tragic) among those of working age, which (apart from wartime), generally represent only J a tiny portion of overall deaths, and would therefore move the overall death rate very little. When considered in terms of ‘life years lost’’ it is indeed tragic if true...
May I suggest you google the National Citizens Inquiry and listen to real experts explain stuff and listen to real time stories. We get 2 to 3 cold viruses per year but we don't die and with no vaccines. The expert explains it like me a non expert can explain it.
Did you know coronavirus 229E named in 1965 was labelled COVID 19. Use brain cells to figure out why. Not difficult.
Farr's Law of epidemiology states all viruses take a natural bell curve and they do not accelerate indefinitely. The scam of 2 weeks to flatten the curve that became 2 years. Viruses flatten themselves with no intervention other than helping miserable cold viruses with natural products and secondary infections that require antibiotics some time.
Jo, It might be a build of a range of factors, might be related to COVID (whaver it is) or might be the vaccine itself. There were a lot of 'odd deaths' as a result of COVID (possibly exacerbated by the results of lockdowns ... isolation, stress caused illness, etc) but VAERS in the US and DAENS in Australia show the same level of reporting post-'vaccine'. In both cases higher adverse reactions than the sum of all previous vaccines forever. Have you ever had an exchange with https://andrewmadry.substack.com/ ... it might be interesting if you are open to it. Cheers
My position is that 1) panic mongering was being done in 2020 and 2) that there was only a pretense of pharmacovigilance for the covid jabs prior to rollout.
While your at it please explain Haiti with barely any COVID vaccines administered. All countries with low vaccination had little covid deaths vs countries with high vaccination. A smart person says if your vaccine works then deaths due to COVID go down not up as happened after the vaccines came. World data shows it. Then please explain the kraken variant the mother of all variants they said which would be more transmissible then omicron. Fear mongering started by same players. They even said you could get it from the ocean and beach. No one listened. People travelled like there was no tomorrow. COVID vaccination all time low everywhere. Same people getting 3rd 4th or 5th dose. Kraken variant disappeared all by itself because no one complied. They lived normally. The scam of the vaccine and lockdowns outed.
Can you explain excess deaths in the Phillipines. It's 500000 up to some time in 2023 and after the vaccines came out. Births are down 1 million since 2020 and specifically after vaccine rollout and this is being discussed in their house of representatives aka as government.
Mid wives state that since 2020 placentas are not healthy looking and mainly to the vaccinated but masks depriving of oxygen can make oxygen deprived placentas in 2020 which makes sense from a noble prize winner.
So when you research please go and do more research on world data and real life happenings because according to the SEC filings of Pfizer Biontek the vaccine would need to be put as the culprit for adverse events due to being experimental. That's how EUA was based on. Meanwhile 2 billion dollar lawsuit by Brook Jackson for fraud in vaccine study trials was there in Jan 2021 well before mass vaccination took place. Lipid nanoparticle is known to cause adverse events the more you dose as per moderna therefore why were carcinogenicity and toxicity studies denied as not needed when in fact all literature and studies on MRNA and lipid nanoparticle indicated toxic events. right up go 2019 and beyond.
When you can answer these questions and research please inform your readers of such.
yeah, but the blip wasn't upwards in 2008 (the crisis started in September of that year) it was downwards in 2009 onwards and the death rate continued to be really low for the next 10 years
https://vigilantnews.com/post/new-report-young-people-dying-of-cancer-at-explosive-rates-uk-government-data-show
What do you think of the many reports like this WRT the overall death rates?
Yes I have looked at this. When looking at the data from the original paper https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/UK%20Cause%20of%20death%20Project%20-%20Malignant%20Neoplasm%20Deaths%2015-44%20-%20Individual%20Causes.htm we see that the deaths are presented for each individual cancer; breast, skin, colon, pancreas and brain and that deaths in 2022 are similar, lower or very slightly higher than previous years between 2010 and 2021.
The largest increase compared to 2021 (the next highest) was 0.4 deaths/100,000 for colon cancer in 15-44 year olds, so 60 more deaths from colon cancer in about 15 million people in 2022 than 2021. This is a variance up and down we would expect from year to year. It is not an explosion. It may be due to all sorts of factors; lack of exercise during lockdowns, reliance on takeaways and increasing obesity.
The problem with the report is the confusion of death rates with 'excess deaths'. Excess deaths are relative to previous years. For example the average for 10 years may be 10 deaths; the next year there may be 15 deaths which is an increase of 50%. This will look alarming when, as they have done, it is represented on a chart. However when looking at previous years you see that deaths have previously gone up or down by around 5, thus averaging 10. A graph showing 50% increase in deaths (the highest was 74% in the alarmist article) is NOT alarming when you look at the original data and see that it represents an increase of 5 deaths in 60 million people.
10 years is not long enough to see definite trends nor to draw a line of best fit, which they've done, there are not enough data points. This article claims that 2022 bucked the downward skin cancer trend, which is not justified from this amount of data; skin cancer deaths were going up and down. A tiny increase of 15 more deaths in 2022 than 2020 may be due to people not getting their moles checked during lockdown? However there were 30 more deaths from skin cancer in 2015 than in 2022!
Ps. The incidence of colorectal cancer in 20-39 year olds in England has been steadily increasing since 1990 and rose significantly in 2010 onwards https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894790/
You are confusing incidence of cancer with cancer death rate.
It may. well increases them, but it's not showing up in the deaths at an explosive rate yet.
Not being a statistician my comments should be taken with a grain of salt...but I believe the percent increase is very significant (and tragic) among those of working age, which (apart from wartime), generally represent only J a tiny portion of overall deaths, and would therefore move the overall death rate very little. When considered in terms of ‘life years lost’’ it is indeed tragic if true...
Young age groups dying suddenly from cancer they just found out about or only has a short time to death. That's what needs explaining.
May I suggest you google the National Citizens Inquiry and listen to real experts explain stuff and listen to real time stories. We get 2 to 3 cold viruses per year but we don't die and with no vaccines. The expert explains it like me a non expert can explain it.
Did you know coronavirus 229E named in 1965 was labelled COVID 19. Use brain cells to figure out why. Not difficult.
Farr's Law of epidemiology states all viruses take a natural bell curve and they do not accelerate indefinitely. The scam of 2 weeks to flatten the curve that became 2 years. Viruses flatten themselves with no intervention other than helping miserable cold viruses with natural products and secondary infections that require antibiotics some time.
Jo, It might be a build of a range of factors, might be related to COVID (whaver it is) or might be the vaccine itself. There were a lot of 'odd deaths' as a result of COVID (possibly exacerbated by the results of lockdowns ... isolation, stress caused illness, etc) but VAERS in the US and DAENS in Australia show the same level of reporting post-'vaccine'. In both cases higher adverse reactions than the sum of all previous vaccines forever. Have you ever had an exchange with https://andrewmadry.substack.com/ ... it might be interesting if you are open to it. Cheers
"The younger people getting vaccinated, particularly 4 doses, are more likely to be"
germophobic?
Clearly, the lack of pharmacovigilance by public health is why data is lacking.
Yes neither vaccine efficacy nor harm can be drawn from observations of self selected groups.
My position is that 1) panic mongering was being done in 2020 and 2) that there was only a pretense of pharmacovigilance for the covid jabs prior to rollout.
Do you agree?
Yes the jabs were untested, useless and designed, like all drugs to keep us fat, sick and on drugs. Pharma and regulation join to make toxic drugs look effective https://jowaller.substack.com/p/how-power-couple-pharma-regulation?utm_source=publication-search
While your at it please explain Haiti with barely any COVID vaccines administered. All countries with low vaccination had little covid deaths vs countries with high vaccination. A smart person says if your vaccine works then deaths due to COVID go down not up as happened after the vaccines came. World data shows it. Then please explain the kraken variant the mother of all variants they said which would be more transmissible then omicron. Fear mongering started by same players. They even said you could get it from the ocean and beach. No one listened. People travelled like there was no tomorrow. COVID vaccination all time low everywhere. Same people getting 3rd 4th or 5th dose. Kraken variant disappeared all by itself because no one complied. They lived normally. The scam of the vaccine and lockdowns outed.
Can you explain excess deaths in the Phillipines. It's 500000 up to some time in 2023 and after the vaccines came out. Births are down 1 million since 2020 and specifically after vaccine rollout and this is being discussed in their house of representatives aka as government.
Mid wives state that since 2020 placentas are not healthy looking and mainly to the vaccinated but masks depriving of oxygen can make oxygen deprived placentas in 2020 which makes sense from a noble prize winner.
So when you research please go and do more research on world data and real life happenings because according to the SEC filings of Pfizer Biontek the vaccine would need to be put as the culprit for adverse events due to being experimental. That's how EUA was based on. Meanwhile 2 billion dollar lawsuit by Brook Jackson for fraud in vaccine study trials was there in Jan 2021 well before mass vaccination took place. Lipid nanoparticle is known to cause adverse events the more you dose as per moderna therefore why were carcinogenicity and toxicity studies denied as not needed when in fact all literature and studies on MRNA and lipid nanoparticle indicated toxic events. right up go 2019 and beyond.
When you can answer these questions and research please inform your readers of such.
Coming and Going-! Can you believe that !
‘No’ purred ‘Dolores’...
yeah, but the blip wasn't upwards in 2008 (the crisis started in September of that year) it was downwards in 2009 onwards and the death rate continued to be really low for the next 10 years
Jabs bad- any island you might be traveling to...