You're being misled: there's no evidence of 'covid' vaccines increasing cancer deaths.

Nor is there evidence of genocide by jab.

Depopulation

For the US

For the UK

A run down of year, Deaths in England and Wales, Death Rate compared to population (not age adjusted)

2019 530, 841 (0.89%)

2020 608,002 (1.02%)

2021 586,334 (0.98%)

2022 576, 334 (0.96%)

2023 580, 073 (0.95%)

For comparison there were 17,700, 6%, more deaths in 2008 (population 54, 841, 000 deaths 509,000= 0.92%) than in the following year of 2009 (population 56,235, 000 491,358 = 0.873%). The number of deaths fell by 17,700, from one year to the next, even though the population was increasing and there was a financial crisis. These things happen and attribution is difficult.

The death rate in 2022 was 0.96%, the population was 60,238,038. Estimating the population for 2023 (with 605,479 births as in 2022) to 60,843517 makes a death rate of 0.95%.

The death rate is decreasing from 2020 and in 2023 was lower than in 2020, 21 and 22 so is also lower than in the years 2000 to 2011 before the death rate dropped to unprecedentedly low levels in 2019.

When age adjusted the death rates for 2022 and 2023 will be even lower because the population of England and Wales is ageing.

The death rate in 2023 is also lower than every year between 1943 and 2008

The stats from the ONS on vaccination status in 2023 for all age groups show all cause mortality of greater in the unvaccinated than in vaccinated in many months including ;

Jan 2023 unvaccinated is 1437deaths /100,000 person years vs 4 doses 1159 deaths/100,000. Feb is 1260 unvaccinated vs 1015 for 4 doses. March is 1168 unvaccinated vs 1035 for 4 doses. April 1106 unvaccinated vs 947 for 4 doses.

However, apparent improvements in mortality from the jabs are confounded by the vaccinated being counted as unvaccinated for 14 days after jabs. They are also confounded by survivorship bias, those surviving to the 4th dose will naturally be from a small group; it should include those who have died from earlier doses. They are also confounded by case counting (from day of vaccination) bias, age and seasonality bias, all of which do not occur with placebo controlled studies. For a brilliant explanation of how a completely ineffective, hypothetical vaccine can be made to look effective eg 48% to 67% effective, please see this paper ‘Sources of bias in observational studies of covid-19 vaccine effectiveness’ from Peter Doshi

For 18-39 years olds excluding ‘covid’ showed apparent increases in vaccinated deaths.

However, this is not a randomised trial. It does not show increased risk of dying from vaccination. The groups are self-selected. The younger people getting vaccinated, particularly 4 doses, are more likely to be asthmatic, obese, have health conditions making vaccination strongly encouraged and/or are already on harmful medications to start with. The unvaccinated are far more likely to be health conscious and not on medication.

For all cause 40-49

The same confounding factors apply as for 18-39 year olds. The one-dose figure for January 2023 of 411 number stands out. It represents deaths in people having had only one dose at least 21 days ago and accounts for 36 deaths in a cohort of about 9000 person years.

The 9000 are the 40-49 year olds who register as having had one dose at anytime in the past 3 years. It does not represent a large number of people suddenly. dying immediately after getting a shot. In many other months and age groups, that are not shown by the authors, single dose deaths are lower than unvaccinated deaths. There many also be issues with underestimating the numbers of people who are unvaccinated, and therefore the number of deaths that he vaccinated are being compared to, will be lower.

Observation studies are so fraught with complications that either side, trying to show vaccine effectiveness or vaccine harm, can show just about anything.

Vaccines are harmful. Don’t have them. However it is not a genocide. The populations of the UK and USA are still increasing.

‘Turbo cancers’ and increases in cancer death.

Mike Donio writes about the excitement over the 200% increase in pancreatic cancer (associated with insulin insensitivity, obesity and saturated animal fat consumption) in young girls; but this was in 2018; so before the jabs.

As regards ‘turbo’ cancers especially in the young; when looking at the data from this original paper we see that the deaths are presented for each individual cancer; breast, skin, colon, pancreas and brain and that deaths in 2022 are similar, lower or very slightly higher than previous years between 2010 and 2021. For example for breast; looking at the circles, nothing to see here at all.

Though perhaps you spotted the red line or ‘trend’ which I certainly wouldn’t have drawn from this scant amount of data, making the same number of deaths (a less than 1 death per 100,000 difference), dipping slightly between 2010 and 2022, though rising again, into a downward trend.

Using the 2022 deaths compared to this false downward trend the authors of a sensationalised review by Edward Dowd misrepresent them as this;

The largest increase compared to 2021 (the next highest year) was 0.4 deaths/100,000 for colon cancer in 15-44 year olds, so 60 more deaths from colon cancer in about 15 million people in 2022 than 2021.

It is not an explosion as the data set is too small to draw this conclusion; but continues the worrying increase in colon cancer in young people (18-39) since 1990 and even more so from 2010.

Colon cancer deaths in 20 to 54 year olds (a slightly older age group) have also been on an upward trend since the mid 1990s shown in this paper from 2017, though they are still lower than in the 1970s when there were over 6 deaths/100,000 compared to the slightly younger age group above of 1.4 deaths/100,000. A larger data set also shows variance, up of down, of about 0.4 deaths/100,000 (aka the explosion above) have often occurred before.

This may be due to all sorts of factors; lack of exercise, junk food and increasing obesity. It could also be due to increased screening and lethal treatment. The incidence of colorectal cancer in 20-39 year olds in England has been steadily increasing since 1990 and rose significantly in 2010 onwards and colon cancer deaths in 20-54 year olds in the US have been significantly increasing since at least the mid 1990s; well before the jabs.

The graphs presented only show 10 years, which is not long enough to see definite trends nor to draw a line of best fit, which they've done, there are not enough data points. This sensationalised article claims that 2022 bucked the downward skin cancer trend, which is not justified from this amount of data; skin cancer deaths were going up and down. A tiny increase of 15 more deaths in 2022 than 2020 may be due to people not getting their moles checked during lockdown? However there were 30 more deaths from skin cancer in 2015 than in 2022

The trend in skin cancer deaths is clearly not down. This is false. Since the early 1970s, melanoma skin cancer mortality rates have increased by around two-and-a-half times (141%) in the UK. Yet they misrepresent 2022 compared to a false trend in the graph above as this sensationalised nonsense in the graph below.

Here’s anther one

The ‘trend’ referred to is the ‘excess’ death of 2018 to 2021 over the previous 5 year average. The data for 2022 to 2024 is only provisional. They are representing the ‘pre-covid’ trend as between 2 years? However, the trend in cancer deaths before 2018 is most certainly upward. We have already seen that 2018 and 2019 buck this trend overall and are low death years. The line of best fit is a straight line from beginning of 2018. The rise in deaths in 2020 can’t be explained away as dry tinder from the low deaths in the second half of 2019. This is is just what happens, deaths go up and down, as we can see all over the graph. That’s why longer term trends must be observed. There certainly isn’t an inflection point. This is just making stuff up. The deviation in deaths/week over the alleged 2 year trend, or the 5 year average, goes up to about 300 per week and is a steady incline. 70,000 babies are born each week in the US; which are added to this age group, now about 277 million people. The deaths must calculated per 100,000 for the graph to make any sense otherwise cancer deaths will just appear to continue to rise and rise!

As we have seen cancer in young people has been increasing from the 1990s, particularly breast cancer. ‘In 2019, new cancer diagnoses among the under 50s totalled 3.26 million, an increase of 79% on the 1990 figure. Overall, breast cancer accounted for the largest number of these cases and associated deaths at 13.7 and 3.5/100,000 of the global population, respectively.’ ‘More than 1 million (1.06) under 50s died of cancer in 2019, an increase of just under 28% on the 1990 figure. After cancer of the breast, cancers exacting the highest death toll and subsequent poor health were those of the windpipe, lung, stomach, and bowel, with the steepest increases in deaths among people with kidney or ovarian cancer.’ ‘But diets high in red meat and salt, and low in fruit; alcohol consumption; and tobacco use are the main risk factors underlying the most common cancers among the under 50s, with physical inactivity, excess weight, and high blood sugar contributory factors, the data indicate.’

There is no evidence that the jabs have caused turbo cancers nor increase in cancer deaths nor are they depopulating us.

But don’t take them! Any of them.

🐒

.