The Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK showed a measly 1.2% efficacy at preventing symptoms. ‘There were 30 (0·5%) cases among 5807 participants in the vaccine arm and 101 (1·7%) cases among 5829 participants in the control group.’ 98.3% of the control group didn’t get any symptoms; during a major pandemic.
The Pfizer had an even worse efficacy of 0.85%. Whistleblowers exposed how specimens were mislabelled and confused, casting very reasonable doubt on the validity of even this clinically insignificant and pathetic difference between treatment and control. Vaccine deaths were also later revealed to have been hidden in the appendix.
The tiny effects of absolute efficacy were not reported in the MSM but rather the relative* efficacy ie the 95% to 100% declared in the headlines. The efficacy demonstrated in trials run by convicted fraudsters was in plain sight for anyone who read these papers at the beginning of December 2020. Though not many people seem to have done.
* Relative efficacy is 50% if 1% get symptoms on treatment arm compared to 2% on placebo arm. Vaccine efficacy =(1- vaccine/treatment) x 100. An absolute efficacy of 0.85% meant that over 100 people had to be vaccinated to prevent 1 person from allegedly developing non specific symptoms or non specific RNA sequences.
If dubious studies (done by convicted criminals for example) show no symptoms of severe disease in the treatment arm but also none or very few in the placebo arm, they can claim that the vaccine has 100% efficacy in preventing severe disease. NB Efficacy studies can’t be done on observational studies, only placebo controlled ones.
Yet still the jabs were rolled out.
Everyone knew that the jabs were not shown to prevent transmission of symptoms because transmission of symptoms by any natural route (other than injecting small mammals with toxic cell cultures directly into their noses, stomachs or brains and calling any pathology an infection) had never been demonstrated.
Yes still the jabs were rolled out.
Lastly a word about pharma marketing website Wikipedia who list number of lives saved by vaccines. It’s nonsense.
This is the important table from the paper that they are quoting for 20th century average annual deaths.
You will see that they cherry pick short periods which show low or high deaths as requires and not the decade as a whole. The years picked can be either after the introduction of the vaccine, around the same time or just before, they are not consistent and nor can they show that any change in deaths/cases were due to the vaccine.
The table doesn't indicate, for example, that deaths for measles which was only 440 on average in the US between 1953 to 1962 was, in fact, itself a massive decline in deaths from the 19th century and early 20th and by 1968, when full introduction of the vaccine occurred, deaths were already even lower than 1953-62.
Most of the periods chosen only go up to the 1950s and since then standards of living and hygiene have improved considerably and DDT etc has been banned.
Wikipedia are also using historical records and estimates. What was classified then as eg ‘smallpox’ then may not be classified as such now.
🐒
Too bloody right
So, basically, it suppressed the detox process of a few folk, and killed a few folk more. Winning!(?)