4 Comments
тна Return to thread

He has bought into the paradigm. Stefan Lanka also bought into the paradigm, but later decided to question some of the basic assumptions and started reaching different conclusions about what virology was seeing or not seeing.

Expand full comment

yes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4ZMZvSpb1U have you seen how Lanka explains virology in 5 seconds?

Expand full comment

ha, ha. It is amazing how detailed they get into describing various structures of viruses, phylogenetic trees, folding proteins, functionality, etc. but there is such an enormous gap between theory and reality. How is this research of benefit? It's like the arguments in the Middle Ages of how many angels could fit on the head of a pin. Might be fun for the scholars, but of no benefit to anyone else.

Expand full comment

We all grew up with the paradigm. It was wallpaper to me. One of those things you believe without realizing there is an alternative. But reading Mike Yeadon as he began to convert to тАШno virusтАЩ, step by step, blew my mind. I had no idea no virus had ever been isolated. I had no idea how absurd their method for тАШprovingтАЩ a virus was. Once you look into it objectively the facade crumbles. It doesnтАЩt take long either. An hour or two of reading.

Expand full comment